Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1059613

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Parking Offences: Appeals
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, in the light of the proposals contained within the Parking (Code of Practice) Bill, what plans they have to introduce a single appeals service for the private parking sector.
tabling member printed	Viscount Astor
uin	HL13636
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/02/2019 answer text <p>The Government is supportive of the Parking (Code of Practice) Bill, which we believe will get the fairest deal for motorists, operators and landowners. Our current intention is to appoint a single appeals service for the private parking sector, using the powers granted by the Parking (Code of Practice) Bill should it pass in to law.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 14/02/2019 17:16:29 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	3429 label Biography information for Viscount Astor

1059625

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Property Guardians
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 covers the rights of individuals who hold a licence as a property guardian.
tabling member printed	Baroness Grender
uin	HL13647
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2019 answer text <p>The Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 will apply to any tenants occupying guardian properties on Assured Shorthold Tenancies. The provisions of the Act will not apply to people who hold licences to occupy; these individuals can contact their local authority if they are concerned about potential health and safety hazards. If these hazards are present, local authorities have tough enforcement powers that are not dependent on the type of tenancy or licence held.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 21/02/2019 16:37:44 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	4291 label Biography information for Baroness Grender

1059626

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Property Guardians
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they have provided to local authorities about the inspection of properties occupied by licensed property guardians that may be subject to house in multiple occupation licensing requirements.
tabling member printed	Baroness Grender
uin	HL13648
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2019 answer text <p>Whether or not a property is a house in multiple occupation (HMO) is set out in Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004, and this definition includes properties occupied under licence agreements. A property that is occupied by three or more people who are from more than one family and who share one or more basic amenity is an HMO, although there are some exemptions to this set out in Part 2 of the Act. HMOs with more than five tenants comprising two or more separate households are usually required to be licensed by the local authority, and local authorities can designate ‘Additional Licensing’ areas, where HMOs with fewer than five tenants are licensed if necessary.</p><p>Detailed guidance for local authorities on the HMO licensing provisions in the Housing Act 2004 is available on the gov.uk website. This guidance covers all properties including those occupied by licensed property guardians. We are also undertaking a review of enforcement guidance for local authorities on private rented sector enforcement. We expect to publish this guidance by the end of March, and to deliver training for all local authorities in March and April.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth grouped question UIN HL13649 question first answered 21/02/2019 16:36:01 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	4291 label Biography information for Baroness Grender

1059627

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Property Guardians
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what criteria would result in a property that is used as a dwelling by a property guardian licensee being designated as a house in multiple occupation.
tabling member printed	Baroness Grender
uin	HL13649
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2019 answer text <p>Whether or not a property is a house in multiple occupation (HMO) is set out in Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004, and this definition includes properties occupied under licence agreements. A property that is occupied by three or more people who are from more than one family and who share one or more basic amenity is an HMO, although there are some exemptions to this set out in Part 2 of the Act. HMOs with more than five tenants comprising two or more separate households are usually required to be licensed by the local authority, and local authorities can designate ‘Additional Licensing’ areas, where HMOs with fewer than five tenants are licensed if necessary.</p><p>Detailed guidance for local authorities on the HMO licensing provisions in the Housing Act 2004 is available on the gov.uk website. This guidance covers all properties including those occupied by licensed property guardians. We are also undertaking a review of enforcement guidance for local authorities on private rented sector enforcement. We expect to publish this guidance by the end of March, and to deliver training for all local authorities in March and April.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth grouped question UIN HL13648 question first answered 21/02/2019 16:36:01 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	4291 label Biography information for Baroness Grender

1059634

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Controlling Migration Fund
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how much of the Controlling Migration Fund has been spent to date; and what estimate they have made of when the total Fund will be spent.
tabling member printed	Lord Hylton
uin	HL13655
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2019 answer text <p>The Controlling Migration Fund opened in November 2016 with the aim of easing pressures on local services linked to recent migration and providing targeted immigration enforcement activity.</p><p>Until 2020 the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has contributed £100 million of funding, with the Home Office contributing £40 million worth of enforcement activity.</p><p>To date the MHCLG element of the fund has approved £73.6 million for projects covering tackling rogue landlords; building cohesion and integration within communities; supporting learning of English language; building capacity to support unaccompanied asylum seeking children; establishing Local Authority Asylum Support Liaison Officers to help new refugees transition from government-funded support into mainstream society and a Modern Day Slavery pilot in 6 local authorities to support the transition process of victims leaving safe houses.</p><p>The deadline for applications to the final round of the MHCLG element of the programme was 1 October last year. We received 149 bids from local authorities for the remaining £26.4 million of available funding. We hope to announce our decisions on these applications soon.</p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 21/02/2019 16:36:54 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	2018 label Biography information for Lord Hylton

1059643

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Property Guardians
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what consideration they are giving to (1) regulating property guardianship, (2) curbing the practice of housing low-income workers in sub-standard, unsafe and unsanitary living conditions, and (3) reclassifying property guardianship under the regulatory framework applicable to houses in multiple occupation.
tabling member printed	Lord Ouseley
uin	HL13663
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/02/2019 answer text <p>The Department is reviewing guidance for current and prospective guardians, to ensure it is as clear and useful as possible.</p><p>Officials are also currently reviewing and refreshing the guidance to local authorities on their enforcement powers, including property guardianships. Under the Housing Act 2004, local authorities have a legal duty to keep the housing conditions in their area under review and identify any action that may need to be taken. Electrical safety, gas safety and fire safety requirements apply to all private rented sector properties, including guardian properties. The Housing Health &amp; Safety Rating System (HHSRS) can be used to assess hazards in residential premises including those let to property guardians and applies to all parts of a building that are occupied as a dwelling. If a local authority identifies a serious ‘category 1’ hazard, they have a duty to take action and have the power to take action to address ‘category 2’ hazards.</p><p>Whether or not a property is a house in multiple occupation (HMO) is set out in the Housing Act 2004, and this definition can include guardian properties occupied by tenants who hold licences, provided the property being occupied meets one of the HMO tests set out in Section 254 of the Act. There are no plans to change this classification.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth question first answered 21/02/2019 16:38:49 answering member 4282 label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
tabling member	2170 label Biography information for Lord Ouseley

1059756

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Landlords: South Yorkshire
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 7 February 2019 to Question 216296 on Landlords: South Yorkshire, for what reasons (a) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and (b) Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council did not meet the assessment criteria.
tabling member constituency	Barnsley Central
tabling member printed	Dan Jarvis
uin	220223
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/02/2019 answer text <p>The terms of the Rogue Landlord Enforcement Grant Fund were set out in the bidding prospectus, from which the assessment criteria were drawn. This included that funds were for the financial year 2018/19. Both Barnsley and Doncaster requested funding for salaried positions continuing into the next financial year, and so falling outside the scope of the Fund.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency South Derbyshire answering member printed Mrs Heather Wheeler question first answered 18/02/2019 15:52:19 answering member 4053 label Biography information for Mrs Heather Wheeler
tabling member	4243 label Biography information for Dan Jarvis

1059791

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Cemeteries: Vandalism
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what funding his Department has allocated to (a) local authorities and (b) the police to protect Jewish and Islamic cemeteries from targeted vandalism in each of the last four years.
tabling member constituency	Hampstead and Kilburn
tabling member printed	Tulip Siddiq
uin	220301
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/02/2019 answer text <p>Vandalism and the desecration of cemeteries are criminal offences and we are confident that these offences will be dealt with appropriately by the police, local services, and criminal justice system. Where these criminal offences are aggravated by hostility towards particular religious communities these will be investigated as hate crimes.</p><p>The Government provides funding support to specialist third party organisations the Community Security Trust and Tell Mama, both of which report hate crimes to the police, spread awareness about hate crimes, and provide victim support.</p> answering member constituency South Derbyshire answering member printed Mrs Heather Wheeler question first answered 18/02/2019 16:45:12 answering member 4053 label Biography information for Mrs Heather Wheeler
tabling member	4518 label Biography information for Tulip Siddiq

1059816

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Sleeping Rough
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he publish the (a) count, (b) estimate, and (c) average number of people rough sleeping in each local authority in each year since 2011.
tabling member constituency	Brighton, Pavilion
tabling member printed	Caroline Lucas
uin	220174
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/02/2019 answer text <p>The annual single night snapshot of rough sleeping in Autumn 2018 was published on January 31 2019 at the link below:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/rough-sleeping-in-england-autumn-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/rough-sleeping-in-england-autumn-2018</a>.</p><p>Table 1 provides figures from annual rough sleeping snapshots in all local authorities in England since 2010 and whether this was derived through a count or an estimate. Each local authority in England chooses whether to inform this annual snapshot via a street count, an evidence-based estimate, or an estimate informed by a spotlight street count.</p><p>The methodology for providing this snapshot has been in place since 2010 and provides a way of approximating the number of people sleeping rough across England on a single night, and tracking change over time. Detailed guidance is provided to authorities on how to conduct counts and estimates; hundreds of local partner agencies participate in the process and Homeless Link are funded to verify all local counts and validate local estimates and demographic information.</p><p>MHCLG is encouraging local authorities with larger numbers of people sleeping rough to improve their year-round monitoring. Due to the difficulties involved in collecting such information, it is not practical to request all local authorities to gather data on the flow of people sleeping rough across the year. This would require extensive local outreach work as well as a substantial database and, especially for local authorities with small numbers of people sleeping rough, would not be an appropriate use of resources.</p><p>In some areas, including London, this is already in place. London’s CHAIN data, which provides information on the individuals seen sleeping rough by outreach teams in London throughout the year as opposed to a single night, was published alongside our own statistics and can be found at the link below.</p><p><a href="https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/chain-reports" target="_blank">https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/chain-reports</a>.</p><p>This Government is committed to reducing homelessness and rough sleeping. No one should ever have to sleep rough. That is why last summer we published the cross-government Rough Sleeping Strategy which sets out an ambitious £100 million package to help people who sleep rough now, but also puts in place the structures that will end rough sleeping once and for all. The Government has now committed over £1.2 billion to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping over the spending review period.</p> answering member constituency South Derbyshire answering member printed Mrs Heather Wheeler question first answered 20/02/2019 16:30:35 answering member 4053 label Biography information for Mrs Heather Wheeler
tabling member	3930 label Biography information for Caroline Lucas

1059817

registered interest
date	12/02/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Housing Revenue Accounts
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what proportion of each local authority's housing revenue account borrowing cap was utilised at the start of the (a) 2017-18 and (b) 2018-19 financial year.
tabling member constituency	Brighton, Pavilion
tabling member printed	Caroline Lucas
uin	220175
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/02/2019 answer text <p>The table below sets out for each local authority with a Housing Revenue Account (HRA) the percentage of their borrowing cap that had been utilised at 1 April 2017 and 1 April 2018. At Autumn Budget we confirmed that the HRA borrowing cap had been abolished. Local authorities are now free to borrow to build a new generation of council housing, in line with the Prudential Code. We expect them to be able to double building to 10,000 homes per year by 2021/22.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Local Authority</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% cap utilised at 1 April 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% cap utilised at 1 April 2018</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Adur</p></td><td><p>87.22%</p></td><td><p>87.22%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Arun</p></td><td><p>69.34%</p></td><td><p>67.87%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ashfield</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ashford</p></td><td><p>94.59%</p></td><td><p>94.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Babergh</p></td><td><p>88.15%</p></td><td><p>87.64%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking &amp; Dagenham</p></td><td><p>98.23%</p></td><td><p>99.37%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>83.99%</p></td><td><p>83.99%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnsley</p></td><td><p>92.11%</p></td><td><p>90.33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barrow-in-Furness</p></td><td><p>56.95%</p></td><td><p>54.54%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Basildon</p></td><td><p>92.34%</p></td><td><p>92.34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bassetlaw</p></td><td><p>90.83%</p></td><td><p>87.26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Birmingham</p></td><td><p>97.55%</p></td><td><p>94.76%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Blackpool</p></td><td><p>13.57%</p></td><td><p>13.57%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bolsover</p></td><td><p>78.83%</p></td><td><p>92.69%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth</p></td><td><p>98.53%</p></td><td><p>84.10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>64.22%</p></td><td><p>74.55%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brentwood</p></td><td><p>85.54%</p></td><td><p>84.85%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brighton &amp; Hove</p></td><td><p>78.50%</p></td><td><p>80.02%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>95.14%</p></td><td><p>95.14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Broxtowe</p></td><td><p>96.28%</p></td><td><p>96.28%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bury</p></td><td><p>87.44%</p></td><td><p>87.44%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>92.84%</p></td><td><p>92.84%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>87.54%</p></td><td><p>89.08%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cannock Chase</p></td><td><p>94.18%</p></td><td><p>94.18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Canterbury</p></td><td><p>78.70%</p></td><td><p>74.54%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Castle Point</p></td><td><p>97.19%</p></td><td><p>97.19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Central Bedfordshire</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>99.94%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Charnwood</p></td><td><p>92.46%</p></td><td><p>92.46%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheltenham</p></td><td><p>84.71%</p></td><td><p>84.71%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cheshire West &amp; Chester</p></td><td><p>83.66%</p></td><td><p>85.96%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chesterfield</p></td><td><p>86.34%</p></td><td><p>85.05%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>City of London</p></td><td><p>0.00%</p></td><td><p>0.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Colchester</p></td><td><p>91.20%</p></td><td><p>91.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Corby</p></td><td><p>91.06%</p></td><td><p>96.50%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cornwall</p></td><td><p>87.75%</p></td><td><p>86.50%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Crawley</p></td><td><p>98.64%</p></td><td><p>98.64%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>96.58%</p></td><td><p>96.58%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dacorum</p></td><td><p>97.95%</p></td><td><p>97.95%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Darlington</p></td><td><p>95.24%</p></td><td><p>94.40%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dartford</p></td><td><p>71.37%</p></td><td><p>66.26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Derby</p></td><td><p>93.64%</p></td><td><p>93.84%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Doncaster</p></td><td><p>98.20%</p></td><td><p>98.56%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dover</p></td><td><p>84.04%</p></td><td><p>81.67%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dudley</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ealing</p></td><td><p>72.38%</p></td><td><p>79.81%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Devon</p></td><td><p>93.24%</p></td><td><p>91.75%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Riding of Yorkshire</p></td><td><p>92.08%</p></td><td><p>91.98%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Eastbourne</p></td><td><p>97.77%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Enfield</p></td><td><p>79.64%</p></td><td><p>90.30%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Epping Forest</p></td><td><p>79.13%</p></td><td><p>79.13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Exeter</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fareham</p></td><td><p>89.96%</p></td><td><p>89.96%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Folkestone &amp; Hythe</p></td><td><p>77.18%</p></td><td><p>77.18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gateshead</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gosport</p></td><td><p>98.34%</p></td><td><p>98.15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gravesham</p></td><td><p>78.59%</p></td><td><p>75.60%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Great Yarmouth</p></td><td><p>87.63%</p></td><td><p>90.47%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greenwich</p></td><td><p>99.99%</p></td><td><p>99.99%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Guildford</p></td><td><p>99.82%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>56.62%</p></td><td><p>56.62%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith &amp; Fulham</p></td><td><p>82.74%</p></td><td><p>82.58%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>75.92%</p></td><td><p>69.08%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Harlow</p></td><td><p>89.72%</p></td><td><p>89.72%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Harrogate</p></td><td><p>72.17%</p></td><td><p>72.17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>99.00%</p></td><td><p>99.98%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hartlepool</p></td><td><p>83.30%</p></td><td><p>90.10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Havering</p></td><td><p>83.57%</p></td><td><p>83.57%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>High Peak</p></td><td><p>83.70%</p></td><td><p>81.87%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>65.85%</p></td><td><p>62.87%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hinckley &amp; Bosworth</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>87.53%</p></td><td><p>87.53%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ipswich</p></td><td><p>84.01%</p></td><td><p>82.03%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>88.56%</p></td><td><p>88.56%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kensington &amp; Chelsea</p></td><td><p>94.84%</p></td><td><p>94.84%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kettering</p></td><td><p>80.51%</p></td><td><p>80.51%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kingston upon Hull</p></td><td><p>78.84%</p></td><td><p>73.74%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kingston upon Thames</p></td><td><p>87.17%</p></td><td><p>88.02%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kirklees</p></td><td><p>98.15%</p></td><td><p>96.03%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>91.68%</p></td><td><p>97.93%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lancaster</p></td><td><p>68.87%</p></td><td><p>67.11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leicester</p></td><td><p>95.78%</p></td><td><p>95.46%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lewes</p></td><td><p>87.54%</p></td><td><p>87.26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>58.74%</p></td><td><p>45.21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lincoln</p></td><td><p>88.62%</p></td><td><p>88.62%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Luton</p></td><td><p>91.15%</p></td><td><p>95.28%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mansfield</p></td><td><p>86.45%</p></td><td><p>83.38%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Medway Towns</p></td><td><p>91.48%</p></td><td><p>90.83%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Melton</p></td><td><p>93.83%</p></td><td><p>93.83%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mid Devon</p></td><td><p>82.14%</p></td><td><p>80.32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mid Suffolk</p></td><td><p>95.50%</p></td><td><p>95.50%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Milton Keynes</p></td><td><p>89.28%</p></td><td><p>88.71%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Forest</p></td><td><p>92.49%</p></td><td><p>92.49%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newark &amp; Sherwood</p></td><td><p>83.07%</p></td><td><p>89.32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newcastle upon Tyne</p></td><td><p>89.69%</p></td><td><p>91.72%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>79.94%</p></td><td><p>79.94%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North East Derbyshire</p></td><td><p>86.07%</p></td><td><p>97.38%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Kesteven</p></td><td><p>86.93%</p></td><td><p>84.33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Tyneside</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North Warwickshire</p></td><td><p>78.98%</p></td><td><p>75.87%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North West Leicestershire</p></td><td><p>83.17%</p></td><td><p>81.98%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northampton</p></td><td><p>89.66%</p></td><td><p>89.66%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumberland</p></td><td><p>96.02%</p></td><td><p>96.02%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>86.80%</p></td><td><p>86.80%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nottingham</p></td><td><p>87.65%</p></td><td><p>92.16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nuneaton &amp; Bedworth</p></td><td><p>86.47%</p></td><td><p>86.47%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oadby &amp; Wigston</p></td><td><p>88.33%</p></td><td><p>90.16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oldham</p></td><td><p>0.00%</p></td><td><p>0.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oxford</p></td><td><p>82.34%</p></td><td><p>82.34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poole</p></td><td><p>95.19%</p></td><td><p>86.65%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>85.16%</p></td><td><p>92.31%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reading</p></td><td><p>91.59%</p></td><td><p>90.81%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Redbridge</p></td><td><p>67.62%</p></td><td><p>67.62%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Redditch</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Richmondshire</p></td><td><p>71.16%</p></td><td><p>67.72%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rotherham</p></td><td><p>90.35%</p></td><td><p>90.35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rugby</p></td><td><p>74.34%</p></td><td><p>74.34%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Runnymede</p></td><td><p>98.37%</p></td><td><p>98.37%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sandwell</p></td><td><p>84.10%</p></td><td><p>86.27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sedgemoor</p></td><td><p>89.92%</p></td><td><p>89.81%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Selby</p></td><td><p>82.34%</p></td><td><p>83.81%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sheffield</p></td><td><p>89.09%</p></td><td><p>89.09%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Shropshire</p></td><td><p>88.51%</p></td><td><p>88.51%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Slough</p></td><td><p>89.11%</p></td><td><p>89.11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Solihull</p></td><td><p>95.67%</p></td><td><p>96.18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Cambridgeshire</p></td><td><p>No data</p></td><td><p>No data</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Derbyshire</p></td><td><p>92.12%</p></td><td><p>92.12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Holland</p></td><td><p>91.84%</p></td><td><p>91.84%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Kesteven</p></td><td><p>80.85%</p></td><td><p>78.47%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Tyneside</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southampton</p></td><td><p>81.75%</p></td><td><p>79.11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southend-on-Sea</p></td><td><p>96.65%</p></td><td><p>96.65%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southwark</p></td><td><p>68.04%</p></td><td><p>74.39%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>St Albans</p></td><td><p>94.42%</p></td><td><p>90.76%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stevenage</p></td><td><p>95.78%</p></td><td><p>94.63%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stockport</p></td><td><p>86.85%</p></td><td><p>90.49%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stoke-on-Trent</p></td><td><p>85.13%</p></td><td><p>85.13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stroud</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td><td><p>100.00%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sutton</p></td><td><p>92.77%</p></td><td><p>97.14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Swindon</p></td><td><p>69.02%</p></td><td><p>66.12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tamworth</p></td><td><p>85.69%</p></td><td><p>85.69%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tandridge</p></td><td><p>86.57%</p></td><td><p>84.46%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Taunton Deane</p></td><td><p>90.14%</p></td><td><p>90.56%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tendring</p></td><td><p>74.81%</p></td><td><p>72.05%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thanet</p></td><td><p>73.32%</p></td><td><p>74.79%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thurrock</p></td><td><p>90.82%</p></td><td><p>91.35%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p>45.70%</p></td><td><p>45.51%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Uttlesford</p></td><td><p>99.01%</p></td><td><p>96.75%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waltham Forest</p></td><td><p>93.23%</p></td><td><p>99.98%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>60.50%</p></td><td><p>54.77%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Warwick</p></td><td><p>90.53%</p></td><td><p>90.53%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waveney</p></td><td><p>88.67%</p></td><td><p>88.67%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Waverley</p></td><td><p>99.94%</p></td><td><p>98.12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wealden</p></td><td><p>86.78%</p></td><td><p>89.63%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Welwyn Hatfield</p></td><td><p>82.64%</p></td><td><p>78.93%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Lancashire</p></td><td><p>83.82%</p></td><td><p>83.82%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>79.82%</p></td><td><p>79.82%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wigan</p></td><td><p>83.62%</p></td><td><p>83.82%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wiltshire</p></td><td><p>96.90%</p></td><td><p>96.90%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Winchester</p></td><td><p>96.17%</p></td><td><p>97.33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Woking</p></td><td><p>95.40%</p></td><td><p>99.22%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wokingham</p></td><td><p>88.35%</p></td><td><p>88.28%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wolverhampton</p></td><td><p>75.39%</p></td><td><p>71.18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>York</p></td><td><p>95.25%</p></td><td><p>95.25%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 19/02/2019 16:35:13 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	3930 label Biography information for Caroline Lucas