Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

101075
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Airspace more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if two non-cooperating aircraft operating in the same Class G airspace at the same time can be regarded as a Risk to Life. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray more like this
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 212060 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
answer text <p>The appropriate military Duty Holder for each aircraft fleet is required to undertake a Risk to Life assessment at quarterly intervals. One of the risks considered is that of mid air collision with non-cooperating aircraft. This includes in uncontrolled airspace away from airfields, airports and the airways system (Class G airspace). Following this assessment, the Duty Holder is required to put in place appropriate controls and mitigating measures to ensure that any potential risk is both tolerable and as low as reasonably practicable.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T17:26:43.522474Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T17:26:43.522474Z
answering member
3938
label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
previous answer version
25872
answering member constituency Rayleigh and Wickford more like this
answering member printed Mr Mark Francois more like this
answering member
1444
label Biography information for Mr Mark Francois more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
101076
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Radioactive Materials more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many nuclear safety events there were at HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport, by category, in each of the last six years. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray more like this
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 212061 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-02-27more like thismore than 2015-02-27
answer text <p>The information requested, accompanied by the category definitions, is provided below.</p><p> </p><p>Events are categorised in accordance with Her Majesty's Naval Base Clyde's internal criteria, which record all events, however seemingly minor. This comprehensive, independent recording process allows Clyde to maintain a robust reporting culture, undertake learning from experience and to take early corrective action. This reporting process has been agreed by, and is subject to routine inspections by, the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.</p><p> </p><p>None of the events in the reports caused any harm to the health of any member of staff on the Naval Base, or to any member of the public, and the severity of the reported events has remained at a very low level. For example, incorrect labelling of an empty pallet and not filling out the correct form before painting inside a submarine are two of the recorded events. Investigations into all such events are carried out and, where necessary, measures are, put in place to prevent a recurrence.</p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Propulsion:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>200910</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>73</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>398</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Weapons:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>53</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>There were no Category A or Category B events involving Nuclear Weapons, nor any Category A events involving Nuclear Propulsion. The details of the twelve Category B incidents involving Nuclear Propulsion are as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Description</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 May 2008</p></td><td><p>Low level contamination detected on the discharge pipework within the Radioactive Effluent Disposal Facility.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Temporary shielding to a valve in the Reactor Compartment had been removed without correct authorisation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent draining of onboard chemically treated water tanks into the contained submarine bilge, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 July 2008</p></td><td><p>A crane at the berth was operated in a non-standard configuration without an approved concession.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 October 2008</p></td><td><p>Radiography Testing using a Faulty Source Mechanism.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 October 2008</p></td><td><p>A diving operation was undertaken while the reactor was operational.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 December 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent shutting of steam valves out-with normal operating procedures.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 February 2009</p></td><td><p>Explosives Handling Jetty (EHJ) 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. While within the capacity of the crane, the number of lifts exceeded the agreed annual total.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20 March 2009</p></td><td><p>EHJ 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. Following the previous incident, a concession was granted, however, this was subsequently exceeded for operational support purposes.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Loss of a freeze seal during routine valve maintenance leading to a contained submarine compartment water spill, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Used protective suits in a double-layered plastic bag were accidentally dropped into the waters in the Base and recovered immediately. A member of staff became wet when recovering them: as a precaution, he was monitored to ensure no contamination, and was given the all clear.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17 August 2012</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent radiation dose received by contractors while conducting submarine tank defect rectification work.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>HM NAVAL BASE CLYDE - NUCLEAR SAFETY EVENT REPORTING</strong></p><p><strong>CATEGORY DEFINITIONS </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p><p><strong>Cat</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Nuclear Event Consequence</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Description</strong></p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>A</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment or over exposure to radiation.</p></td><td rowspan="2"><p>· Major failure of Site or Nuclear Propulsion/Nuclear Weapon (NP/NW) services.</p><p> </p><p>· Major reduction of defence in depth.</p><p> </p><p>· Major failure in administrative controls or regulatory compliance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>B</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for a contained release within building or submarine or unplanned exposure to radiation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>C</p></td><td><p>Moderate potential for future release or exposure, or localised release within a designated radiological controlled area.</p></td><td><p>· Minor failure of Site or NP/NW services (eg with protection via defence in depth).</p><p> </p><p>· Minor regulatory or procedural compliance breach.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>D</p></td><td><p>Low potential for release – but may contribute towards an adverse trend producing latent conditions.</p></td><td><p>· Poor safety culture, eg:</p><p> </p><p>- Failure to report shortfalls.</p><p>- Communication failures.</p><p>- Leadership issues.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 212062 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-02-27T13:26:10.957Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-27T13:26:10.957Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
25856
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
101077
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Radioactive Materials more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many nuclear safety events there were at HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport involving (a) Class A and (b) Class B incidents involving (i) nuclear propulsion and (ii) nuclear weapons; and what the details were of each such incident. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray more like this
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 212062 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-02-27more like thismore than 2015-02-27
answer text <p>The information requested, accompanied by the category definitions, is provided below.</p><p> </p><p>Events are categorised in accordance with Her Majesty's Naval Base Clyde's internal criteria, which record all events, however seemingly minor. This comprehensive, independent recording process allows Clyde to maintain a robust reporting culture, undertake learning from experience and to take early corrective action. This reporting process has been agreed by, and is subject to routine inspections by, the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.</p><p> </p><p>None of the events in the reports caused any harm to the health of any member of staff on the Naval Base, or to any member of the public, and the severity of the reported events has remained at a very low level. For example, incorrect labelling of an empty pallet and not filling out the correct form before painting inside a submarine are two of the recorded events. Investigations into all such events are carried out and, where necessary, measures are, put in place to prevent a recurrence.</p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Propulsion:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>200910</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>73</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>398</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Weapons:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>53</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>There were no Category A or Category B events involving Nuclear Weapons, nor any Category A events involving Nuclear Propulsion. The details of the twelve Category B incidents involving Nuclear Propulsion are as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Description</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 May 2008</p></td><td><p>Low level contamination detected on the discharge pipework within the Radioactive Effluent Disposal Facility.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Temporary shielding to a valve in the Reactor Compartment had been removed without correct authorisation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent draining of onboard chemically treated water tanks into the contained submarine bilge, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 July 2008</p></td><td><p>A crane at the berth was operated in a non-standard configuration without an approved concession.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 October 2008</p></td><td><p>Radiography Testing using a Faulty Source Mechanism.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 October 2008</p></td><td><p>A diving operation was undertaken while the reactor was operational.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 December 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent shutting of steam valves out-with normal operating procedures.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 February 2009</p></td><td><p>Explosives Handling Jetty (EHJ) 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. While within the capacity of the crane, the number of lifts exceeded the agreed annual total.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20 March 2009</p></td><td><p>EHJ 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. Following the previous incident, a concession was granted, however, this was subsequently exceeded for operational support purposes.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Loss of a freeze seal during routine valve maintenance leading to a contained submarine compartment water spill, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Used protective suits in a double-layered plastic bag were accidentally dropped into the waters in the Base and recovered immediately. A member of staff became wet when recovering them: as a precaution, he was monitored to ensure no contamination, and was given the all clear.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17 August 2012</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent radiation dose received by contractors while conducting submarine tank defect rectification work.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>HM NAVAL BASE CLYDE - NUCLEAR SAFETY EVENT REPORTING</strong></p><p><strong>CATEGORY DEFINITIONS </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p><p><strong>Cat</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Nuclear Event Consequence</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Description</strong></p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>A</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment or over exposure to radiation.</p></td><td rowspan="2"><p>· Major failure of Site or Nuclear Propulsion/Nuclear Weapon (NP/NW) services.</p><p> </p><p>· Major reduction of defence in depth.</p><p> </p><p>· Major failure in administrative controls or regulatory compliance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>B</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for a contained release within building or submarine or unplanned exposure to radiation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>C</p></td><td><p>Moderate potential for future release or exposure, or localised release within a designated radiological controlled area.</p></td><td><p>· Minor failure of Site or NP/NW services (eg with protection via defence in depth).</p><p> </p><p>· Minor regulatory or procedural compliance breach.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>D</p></td><td><p>Low potential for release – but may contribute towards an adverse trend producing latent conditions.</p></td><td><p>· Poor safety culture, eg:</p><p> </p><p>- Failure to report shortfalls.</p><p>- Communication failures.</p><p>- Leadership issues.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 212061 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-02-27T13:26:11.173Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-27T13:26:11.173Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
25839
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
101081
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Defence Cultural Specialist Unit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many weeks of cultural and historical training the average graduate of the Defence Cultural Specialist Unit course receives in addition to their language training. more like this
tabling member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
tabling member printed
Rory Stewart more like this
uin 211975 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
answer text <p>The Defence Cultural Specialist Unit is not a training establishment and therefore does not offer any courses in the generally accepted use of the term. Its role is to prepare and provide Cultural Specialists and Human Terrain Analysts for units at readiness or deploying on operations. The Unit works with a variety of organisations, including the Defence Centre for Language and Culture at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, to ensure that its personnel are appropriately trained to meet the UK's commitments.</p><p>After the completion of appropriate language training, which also includes elements of cultural and historical learning, a Cultural Specialist will receive, on average, between 3-5 weeks of cultural and historical training specific to their future role.</p><p>Since the Defence Cultural Specialist Unit was formed in 2010, 59 personnel have spent more than six months undertaking related studies. These are provided at a range of locations, including the Defence Centre for Language and Culture at the Defence Academy. As at 30 October 2014 the Unit had seven personnel undertaking cultural and historical training.</p>
answering member constituency Rayleigh and Wickford more like this
answering member printed Mr Mark Francois more like this
grouped question UIN 211968 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T17:29:48.3510168Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T17:29:48.3510168Z
answering member
1444
label Biography information for Mr Mark Francois more like this
previous answer version
25865
answering member constituency Sevenoaks more like this
answering member printed Michael Fallon more like this
answering member 88
tabling member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
101082
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Veterans: Mental Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 5 September 2014 to Question 207562, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that ex-service personnel in receipt of disablement pensions with conditions related to mental disorders receive adequate treatment for their condition. more like this
tabling member constituency Vale of Clwyd more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Ruane more like this
uin 212009 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-25more like thismore than 2014-11-25
answer text <p>Primary responsibility for the mental health care of veterans lies with the National Health Service (NHS) in England and the Devolved Administrations. The NHS provides appropriate healthcare for veterans, regardless of whether or not they are in receipt of a disablement pension.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-25T16:59:46.997Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-25T16:59:46.997Z
answering member
3938
label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
tabling member
534
label Biography information for Chris Ruane more like this
101088
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-27
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Defence Cultural Specialist Unit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many members of the armed forces have spent more than six months studying with the Defence Cultural Specialist Unit; and how many are studying now. more like this
tabling member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
tabling member printed
Rory Stewart more like this
uin 211968 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
answer text <p>The Defence Cultural Specialist Unit is not a training establishment and therefore does not offer any courses in the generally accepted use of the term. Its role is to prepare and provide Cultural Specialists and Human Terrain Analysts for units at readiness or deploying on operations. The Unit works with a variety of organisations, including the Defence Centre for Language and Culture at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, to ensure that its personnel are appropriately trained to meet the UK's commitments.</p><p>After the completion of appropriate language training, which also includes elements of cultural and historical learning, a Cultural Specialist will receive, on average, between 3-5 weeks of cultural and historical training specific to their future role.</p><p>Since the Defence Cultural Specialist Unit was formed in 2010, 59 personnel have spent more than six months undertaking related studies. These are provided at a range of locations, including the Defence Centre for Language and Culture at the Defence Academy. As at 30 October 2014 the Unit had seven personnel undertaking cultural and historical training.</p>
answering member constituency Rayleigh and Wickford more like this
answering member printed Mr Mark Francois more like this
grouped question UIN 211975 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T17:29:48.4349308Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T17:29:48.4349308Z
answering member
1444
label Biography information for Mr Mark Francois more like this
previous answer version
25866
answering member constituency Sevenoaks more like this
answering member printed Michael Fallon more like this
answering member 88
tabling member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
100933
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Red Arrows more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what planning assumptions are in place for the Red Arrows when the current fleet of aircraft are due for replacement; and what aircraft type, if any, will replace them. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord West of Spithead more like this
uin HL2401 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-07more like thismore than 2014-11-07
answer text <p>I refer the noble Lord to the answer given by the Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology (Philip Dunne) in the House of Commons on 7 November 2013 (Official Report, column 307W). As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence (Michael Fallon) has recently said, the Red Arrows will continue flying</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Astor of Hever more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-07T14:58:28.2066649Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-07T14:58:28.2066649Z
answering member
3428
label Biography information for Lord Astor of Hever more like this
attachment
1
file name Red Arrows.doc 7 November 2013 HL2401.doc more like this
title Hansard Extract 7 November 2013 more like this
tabling member
3834
label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead more like this
100937
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Aircraft Carriers more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they expect that HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales will each proceed to sea under their own power for the first time. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord West of Spithead more like this
uin HL2405 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-07more like thismore than 2014-11-07
answer text <p>Final equipment installation and system commissioning plans are currently being developed for both ships. We expect HMS Queen Elizabeth to proceed to sea under her own power for the first time in early 2017 and HMS Prince of Wales in early 2019.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Astor of Hever more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-07T14:58:52.9999014Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-07T14:58:52.9999014Z
answering member
3428
label Biography information for Lord Astor of Hever more like this
tabling member
3834
label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead more like this
100938
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether any of Her Majesty’s ships have had to cancel planned operations due to shortage of trained manpower over the last 12 months. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord West of Spithead more like this
uin HL2406 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-11more like thismore than 2014-11-11
answer text <p>The Royal Navy has not cancelled any planned operations due to a shortage of trained manpower over the last 12 months.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Astor of Hever more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-11T16:07:38.9251477Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-11T16:07:38.9251477Z
answering member
3428
label Biography information for Lord Astor of Hever more like this
tabling member
3834
label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead more like this
100945
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Credit Unions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when servicemen and servicewomen will be able to access credit union facilities through payroll deduction. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Kennedy of Southwark more like this
uin HL2413 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-18more like thismore than 2014-11-18
answer text <p>I refer the noble Lord to the answer given in the House of Commons on 6 October 2014 to Question 208271. We fully endorse existing, strong credit unions expanding their membership to include the Armed Forces community.</p><p> </p><p>As the noble Lord will be aware, when he met my hon. Friend, the Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans (Anna Soubry) on 15 October, she confirmed that the facilitation of payroll deduction for Credit Unions is technically possible and that our payroll provider is engaged with officials to scope and cost such deductions. Further work is underway to determine the criteria for access to this facility, and to develop an education campaign for our personnel so they may make informed choices.</p><p> </p><p>Any payroll changes need to be delivered in one of the three releases per year of the intranet-based personnel administration system we use. It is now too late to deliver in November 2014. March 2015 is dedicated to the new pension scheme, therefore the most likely delivery date will be July 2015.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Astor of Hever more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-18T17:43:55.333Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-18T17:43:55.333Z
answering member
3428
label Biography information for Lord Astor of Hever more like this
attachment
1
file name HOC 208271 6 October 2014.doc more like this
title Hansard Extract 6 October 2014 more like this
tabling member
4153
label Biography information for Lord Kennedy of Southwark more like this