Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1226082
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-07-17
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Yemen: Military Intervention more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the written answer by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for the Ministry of Defence on 13 July (68798), how many of the 535 incidents referred to in the "Tracker" database record a civilian harm incident as a "mistake" by the Saudi-led coalition. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Browne of Ladyton more like this
uin HL6966 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-28more like thismore than 2020-07-28
answer text <p>As explained by the International Trade Secretary on 7 July 2020, all of the allegations recorded on the Tracker have been subject to detailed analysis by reference to the relevant principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and in the light of all the information and intelligence available. An evaluation has then been made, in respect of each incident, whether it is possible that it constitutes a breach of IHL or whether it is unlikely that it represents a breach. The assessment of whether it is possible that an incident constituted a breach of IHL uses all available sources of information, including some that are necessarily confidential and sensitive. We are therefore not able to go into the details of individual assessments.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-28T14:20:12.1Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-28T14:20:12.1Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
620
label Biography information for Lord Browne of Ladyton more like this
1226098
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-07-17
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Coronavirus more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many serving personnel in the Armed Forces aged (1) 18–24, (2) 25–29, (3) 30–34, (4) 35–39, (5) 40 or more, years old have (a) contracted, and (b) died as a result of, COVID-19. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Robathan more like this
uin HL6982 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-08-03more like thismore than 2020-08-03
answer text <p>As at 17 July 2020 (inclusive), 406 UK Armed Forces personnel had a positive COVID-19 infection test result entered into their medical record. Of which:</p><ul><li>57 were aged 18-24 years.</li><li>70 were aged 25-29 years.</li><li>66 were aged 30-34 years.</li><li>61 were aged 35-39 years</li><li>152 were aged 40+years</li></ul><p>Two of these UK Armed Forces personnel with a positive COVID-19 infection test result subsequently died; both personnel were aged 40+ years.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-08-03T11:52:41.773Zmore like thismore than 2020-08-03T11:52:41.773Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
334
label Biography information for Lord Robathan more like this
1226099
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-07-17
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Coronavirus more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether it is their policy that Armed Forces personnel be confined to barracks during the COVID-19 pandemic; and if so, whether any such policy has applied to (1) personnel undergoing training at depots, schools, bases and officer training establishments, (2) directing staff at such training establishments, and (3) all trained personnel of whatever rank. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Robathan more like this
uin HL6983 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-27more like thismore than 2020-07-27
answer text <p>It is not Defence policy that Armed Forces personnel be confined to barracks during the COVID-19 pandemic. The only occasions on which personnel may be confined to their accommodation are if they are self- or household-isolating, or if they are required to isolate for a short period prior to deployment.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-27T10:32:34.777Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-27T10:32:34.777Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
334
label Biography information for Lord Robathan more like this
1226104
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-07-17
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Russia: Navy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the security of the Baltic and North Sea following recent reports that the Russian navy will commission 40 new vessels in 2020. more like this
tabling member printed
Viscount Waverley more like this
uin HL6988 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-29more like thismore than 2020-07-29
answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence monitors the development of all new Russian vessels commissioned and makes assessments based on their operational capability. We continue to assess the impact of Russian naval investments to regional security, including the Baltic and North Seas. Russia continues to be a significant state-based threat to the UK; monitoring and responding to this threat is a core priority for the Ministry of Defence.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-29T14:12:42.807Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-29T14:12:42.807Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
1744
label Biography information for Viscount Waverley more like this
1225898
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-16more like thismore than 2020-07-16
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Submarines: Accidents more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch Report on the investigation of the near miss between the ro-ro ferry Stena Superfast VII and a submerged Royal Navy submarine in the North Channel on 6 November 2018, published on 16 July; and what steps they are taking to ensure similar incidents do not reoccur. [T] more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick more like this
uin HL6949 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-23more like thismore than 2020-07-23
answer text <p>Ensuring safety at sea is a top priority for the Royal Navy. The Marine Accident Investigation Branch's (MAIB) report is welcomed and the Royal Navy fully accepts their recommendation.</p><p>Actions have been taken to prevent re-occurrence and a system of assurance is in place in accordance with the Navy's Safety Management System.  To deliver the MAIB's recommendation, the Fleet Commander has directed an independent review of the actions taken to provide assurance that such actions have been effective. This review will be led by the Defence Maritime Regulator, part of the independent Defence Safety Authority.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-23T11:12:34.647Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-23T11:12:34.647Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
4130
label Biography information for Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick more like this
1225412
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-15more like thismore than 2020-07-15
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading HMS Queen Elizabeth: South China Sea more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to send the HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier to the South China Sea; and if so, (1) when the decision was made, and (2) what will be the objective. more like this
tabling member printed
Viscount Waverley more like this
uin HL6914 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-23more like thismore than 2020-07-23
answer text <p>No decision has yet been made. Cross Government consultation is in progress and we expect to finalise the details of the deployment soon. The UK has enduring interests in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region and the Royal Navy has maintained a near persistent presence there for a number of years, conducting numerous activities promoting security and defence relationships with our partners and upholding the Rules Based International System. Building on this, the Royal Navy intends to continue to operate across the region, including in the South China Sea.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-23T11:11:12.827Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-23T11:11:12.827Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
1744
label Biography information for Viscount Waverley more like this
1225413
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-15more like thismore than 2020-07-15
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Russia: Submarines more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment has been made of recent Russian submarine deployment into the Mediterranean and Baltic seas. more like this
tabling member printed
Viscount Waverley more like this
uin HL6915 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-27more like thismore than 2020-07-27
answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence monitors the deployments of Russian submarines and makes assessments based on their operational capability. A nuclear-powered submarine transited from its Northern Fleet base to St Petersburg where it will take part in Russia's Navy Day on 26th July, as part of a predicted annual commitment. A further Russian submarine transited from its Black Sea base port to Tartus, Syria, as part of their routine presence operations in the eastern Mediterranean. Russia continues to be a significant state-based threat to the UK; monitoring and responding to this threat is a core priority for the Ministry of Defence.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-27T10:33:11.55Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-27T10:33:11.55Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
1744
label Biography information for Viscount Waverley more like this
1224728
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-14more like thismore than 2020-07-14
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces and Police: Common Purpose more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether any member of (1) the British Armed Forces, and (2) a police force, has been sent on a leadership course run by Common Purpose; and, if so, (a) how many during each of the last 20 years, and (b) for what reason. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass more like this
uin HL6854 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-28more like thismore than 2020-07-28
answer text <p>Information about the courses attended by the British Armed Forces personnel during the last 20 years is not held in a way which would allow a fuller answer without incuring disproportionate cost. Some records, however, show that between 2014 and 2019 six Army officers, one in each year, attended leadership development courses provided by Common Purpose. The RAF and the Royal Navy have not used programmes run by Common Purpose to train personnel.</p><p> </p><p>Some individuals may have undertaken training with this company during their resettlement period on leaving the Services. The comprehensive leadership skills and qualifications attained in the Armed Forces means that such training is rarely considered necessary</p><p><br> Confirming this would require manually checking all service leavers’ Joint Personnel Administration records to identify, retrieve and collate the details. This information could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>No information is held centrally by the Home Office about external courses attended by individual police officers. Police training and development is a matter for the College of Policing and for police forces locally.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-28T11:20:44.74Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-28T11:20:44.74Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
648
label Biography information for Lord Maginnis of Drumglass more like this
1222939
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-10more like thismore than 2020-07-10
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Justice 4 Troops more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the organisation Justice 4 Troops, established on 5 June to address military grievances. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Garden of Frognal more like this
uin HL6714 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-22more like thismore than 2020-07-22
answer text <p>There is a well-established Service Complaints process for those personnel who wish to raise grievances about any aspect of their Service life. This is underpinned by legislation and independently overseen by the Service Complaints Ombudsman (SCO) for the Armed Forces. Justice 4 Troops is a community interest company incorporated in July 2019. Justice4Troops has no official mandate to intervene in grievances or their handling; this is a role it has self-appointed. Accordingly, no assessment has been made, nor is one appropriate. Representations received from this organisation are not afforded any particular status within the Ministry of Defence, but we do remain concerned to ensure that the individuals who engage with Justice4Troops are provided with unbiased advice to ensure that they do not miss the opportunity to raise any grievance through the official channels.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-22T13:37:04.413Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-22T13:37:04.413Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
3842
label Biography information for Baroness Garden of Frognal more like this
1222762
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-07-09more like thismore than 2020-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Defence remove filter
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many houses on the defence estate are available to survivors of domestic abuse. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Tunnicliffe more like this
uin HL6692 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-07-16more like thismore than 2020-07-16
answer text <p>There is no statutory offence of ‘domestic abuse’ and actions amounting to it could be recorded under a number of offences such as Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH), Actual Bodily Harm (ABH), Common Assault or sexual offences. Furthermore, within military police crime-recording systems, the categorisation of whether an incident involves ‘domestic violence’ or not, is not a mandatory field, meaning that the figures provided are indicative only.</p><p> </p><p>The first document provided gives figures for the number of reported offences for each Service for the years 2015-2020 to date where the incident has been categorised as involving domestic violence. The second document provided gives figures for each Service for the years 2015-2020 to date, for the number of GBH, ABH, and Common Assault offences. The noble Lord should note that in both of the documents, the figures given are for reported offences – that is, to say an allegation has been made. These figures do not relate to charges brought or court convictions.</p><p> </p><p>An average time cannot be given regarding the Chain of Command (CoC) reporting such incidents to the Service Police. Every case would require examination to determine when it was reported to the Service Police and not every investigation file may contain the date when an incident was originally reported to the CoC. Therefore, we would not be able to provide a complete answer and what we could provide could be provided only at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>However where reported to the CoC, any incident of domestic abuse must be reported to the Service Police no later than 24 hours after the incident has occurred. Further to this, a referral to the Welfare Service must be made in any situation involving domestic abuse or similar allegations.</p><p>Whilst there are no houses on the defence estate dedicated specifically for survivors of domestic abuse, support is provided through a suite of policies which seek to provide housing options for families in times of estrangement.</p><p> </p><p>Short term accommodation for welfare or compassionate reasons is administered by Service welfare associations. Tri-Service accommodation policy requires the provision of welfare houses at each designated establishment, scaled to reflect density of Service population. Unit welfare staff, in conjunction with civilian police and local authorities assess whether utilisation of such are in the best interests of safeguarding abuse survivors, and may provide alternative accommodation (through local authority or charitable provision) if distance between perpetrator and survivor is required.</p><p> </p><p>The MOD is currently reviewing the tri-service policy on domestic abuse with the help of leading charity Hestia, who sit alongside MOD on the Employer’s Initiative on Domestic Abuse. It is intended that this policy apply to the whole force – civilians, contractors and the single Services. The review will also focus on the availability of accommodation for survivors, taking advice from the domestic abuse charity Standing Together. MOD intends to refresh and re-launch the policy towards the end of 2020.</p><p> </p><p>The MOD continually monitors whole force data on domestic abuse for prevalence and risk factors – this has been of particular focus during the Covid-19 pandemic. This data is disseminated and discussed within the MOD Domestic Abuse Stakeholder Forum the Domestic Abuse Working Group (DAWG), which meets quarterly. The DAWG seeks advice and guidance from national domestic abuse charities like Hestia, Aurora New Dawn and the Employer’s Initiative on Domestic Abuse, resulting in continual policy improvement.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Baroness Goldie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6648 more like this
HL6693 more like this
HL6694 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-07-16T15:11:17.307Zmore like thismore than 2020-07-16T15:11:17.307Z
answering member
4306
label Biography information for Baroness Goldie more like this
tabling member
3671
label Biography information for Lord Tunnicliffe more like this