Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

758575
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-09-07more like thismore than 2017-09-07
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading Department for Communities and Local Government: Written Questions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House what explanation, if any, she has received from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government as to why six questions for written answer tabled on or before 19 July had not been answered by 6 September; and when she expects those questions to be answered. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jopling more like this
uin HL1446 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-09-14more like thismore than 2017-09-14
answer text <p>As Leader of the House I take very seriously the responsibility incumbent on all Ministers to provide full, timely and comprehensible answers to Questions for Written Answer (QWAs).</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>In this instance I am informed by the Department that delays to five of these late responses were as a result of administrative errors. I have been advised that these issues have now been identified and resolved. I have been reassured that the Secretary of State takes this seriously and that he has made clear to officials that it is essential it does not happen again. The members concerned were contacted by the Department to apologise for the delay and these questions have now been answered.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>With regard to question number HL1066 from Lord Pearson of Rannoch, this remained unanswered by 6 September due to an error with IT systems maintained by the House which meant that it was not allocated to the correct department. The technical issue which was causing problems with transfers and amendments has now been resolved and the question has now been answered.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>My office will continue to work with all departments to ensure prompt and satisfactory answers to QWAs.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-14T11:14:28.06Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-14T11:14:28.06Z
answering member
4329
label Biography information for Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
tabling member
883
label Biography information for Lord Jopling more like this
582663
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-09-13more like thismore than 2016-09-13
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading Ministry of Justice: Written Questions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House what explanation she has received from the Ministry of Justice concerning its failure to answer by 9 September a Question for Written Answer that was asked on 20 July (HL1379). more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jopling more like this
uin HL1846 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-09-27more like thismore than 2016-09-27
answer text <p><strong>The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Evans of Bowes Park):</strong></p><p>I regularly stress to departments the importance of giving timely answers to Questions for Written Answer. My office immediately approach departments who have not responded to questions after 10 working days, and remain in contact with them until the questions are answered. This process has been followed in both of the cases to which the noble Lord refers.</p><p>In the case of the Ministry of Justice question, I am informed that the delay related the process of transferring it to the right department for response. After discussion it was transferred to the Cabinet Office, who will provide a substantive answer by close of play this week. As regards the Department for Education questions, I am informed that the delay related to gathering complex data spanning a long period and the need to obtain clearance from across government. Both of the questions concerned have now been answered.</p><p>Regarding timely replies more generally, I have recently written to the three departments with the greatest proportion of late responses in the last session and I regularly set out the House’s expectations as they apply to QWAs to my frontbench team. Notwithstanding the cases referenced above, I am pleased to say that the proportion of on-time responses from the Ministry of Justice rose from 74% of questions in 2014-15 to 87% in 2015-16; while the Department for Education answered well over 90% of questions on time in both sessions.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-09-27T15:42:54.783Zmore like thismore than 2016-09-27T15:42:54.783Z
answering member
4329
label Biography information for Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
tabling member
883
label Biography information for Lord Jopling more like this
576333
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-09-05more like thismore than 2016-09-05
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: Written Questions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House, further to her Written Statement on 21 July (HLWS128), what discussion she has had with the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills in the light of that Department's position as the Department having the worst record in answering Questions for Written Answer within 10 working days, and whether the Secretary of State intends to make a Written Statement to explain what steps have been taken within that Department to match the overall record of government departments in answering 93 per cent of Written Question within 10 working days. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jopling more like this
uin HL1573 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-09-19more like thismore than 2016-09-19
answer text <p>I take very seriously my responsibility as Leader of the House to encourage Ministers to be punctual in answering written questions. I recently published data on departmental performance in answering Questions for Written Answer for the 2015/16 session, where I was pleased to see that 93% of questions were answered within 10 working days. Nevertheless, we must always strive to do better. I have written to the three departments with the greatest proportion of late responses in the last session to make clear the House’s expectations and to stress the importance of timely responses.</p><p> </p><p>Though the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (formerly the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills) received 475 Questions for Written Answer in 2015/16 - more than double the number received in the previous session - Ministers were nevertheless disappointed by the department’s performance. In response the department has put in place a range of actions to improve performance, including strengthening internal deadlines and procedures. Baroness Neville-Rolfe, as the Lords Minister, has stressed to me how seriously the department takes its responsibilities to Parliament and is confident that performance will improve in this session.</p><p><br>My office continues to work with all departments to ensure prompt and comprehensive responses to all Questions for Written Answer. I will continue to publish data on an annual basis to allow analysis of performance over time. This practice is important in highlighting where improvements in timeliness could and should be made.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-09-19T09:08:00.623Zmore like thismore than 2016-09-19T09:08:00.623Z
answering member
4329
label Biography information for Baroness Evans of Bowes Park more like this
tabling member
883
label Biography information for Lord Jopling more like this
513489
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-04-18more like thismore than 2016-04-18
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading Cabinet Office: Written Questions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House what discussions she has had with Ministers in the Cabinet Office with regard to the number of Questions for Written Answer not answered within 10 working days. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jopling more like this
uin HL7746 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-04-29more like thismore than 2016-04-29
answer text <p>My responsibility as Leader of the House, to encourage Ministers to be punctual in answering written questions, is one I take seriously. My office immediately approach departments who have not responded to questions after 10 working days, and remain in contact with them until the questions are answered. This process was followed with the Cabinet Office for the seven questions that remained unanswered after 10 working days on 18 March. All of those questions have now been answered. At the end of this Session I will publish data on each department’s promptness in dealing with Questions for Written Answer to allow for proper scrutiny of their performance.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-04-29T13:22:27.087Zmore like thismore than 2016-04-29T13:22:27.087Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
883
label Biography information for Lord Jopling more like this
423149
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-10-22more like thismore than 2015-10-22
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading Peers: Ministerial Policy Advisers more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment has been made of whether denying a member of the House of Lords who is a Special Adviser the right to speak is in breach of the letters patent, which refer to "seat" and "voice". more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
uin HL2899 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-11-05more like thismore than 2015-11-05
answer text <p>A member of the House of Lords who is eligible to take part in the work of the House, and who is also a serving special adviser, is not denied the right to speak. It has, however, been an accepted practice under successive administrations that members in that position vote but refrain from speaking.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-11-05T15:38:41.287Zmore like thismore than 2015-11-05T15:38:41.287Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
499
label Biography information for Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
387758
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading House of Lords: Parliamentary Procedure more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House whether the speaking rights of the second largest opposition party front bench in the House of Lords can be reallocated to the opposition party with the second highest votes cast at the last general election. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
uin HL1135 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The second largest opposition party is neither formally defined nor given specific speaking rights by the Standing Orders of the House or the Companion to the Standing Orders. The Companion to Standing Orders does, however, set out several areas where the “opposition front benches” have the right to speak for longer than backbenchers or have rights to speak at specific points in proceedings.<br><br>Of the political parties represented in the House, only the Official Opposition and the Liberal Democrat group operate frontbenches of a size that permits them to shadow each Government department. It is for that reason that the definition of “opposition frontbenches” that applied in practice before the 2010 Parliament has been reverted to in this Parliament. <br><br>It remains open to any member who wishes to propose a change to current arrangements to make representations to me and/or make a submission to the Procedure Committee.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1136 more like this
HL1137 more like this
HL1138 more like this
HL1139 more like this
HL1588 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.41Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.41Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
499
label Biography information for Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
387759
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading House of Lords: Parliamentary Procedure more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House what rules apply, and what advice is sought, when a political party seeks to establish or assume front-bench speaking rights in the House of Lords; and when the rules were first established. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
uin HL1136 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The second largest opposition party is neither formally defined nor given specific speaking rights by the Standing Orders of the House or the Companion to the Standing Orders. The Companion to Standing Orders does, however, set out several areas where the “opposition front benches” have the right to speak for longer than backbenchers or have rights to speak at specific points in proceedings.<br><br>Of the political parties represented in the House, only the Official Opposition and the Liberal Democrat group operate frontbenches of a size that permits them to shadow each Government department. It is for that reason that the definition of “opposition frontbenches” that applied in practice before the 2010 Parliament has been reverted to in this Parliament. <br><br>It remains open to any member who wishes to propose a change to current arrangements to make representations to me and/or make a submission to the Procedure Committee.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1135 more like this
HL1137 more like this
HL1138 more like this
HL1139 more like this
HL1588 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.49Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.49Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
499
label Biography information for Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
387761
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading House of Lords: Parliamentary Procedure more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House whether UKIP Peers in the House of Lords are to be granted opposition front-bench speaking rights; and if not, why not. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
uin HL1138 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The second largest opposition party is neither formally defined nor given specific speaking rights by the Standing Orders of the House or the Companion to the Standing Orders. The Companion to Standing Orders does, however, set out several areas where the “opposition front benches” have the right to speak for longer than backbenchers or have rights to speak at specific points in proceedings.<br><br>Of the political parties represented in the House, only the Official Opposition and the Liberal Democrat group operate frontbenches of a size that permits them to shadow each Government department. It is for that reason that the definition of “opposition frontbenches” that applied in practice before the 2010 Parliament has been reverted to in this Parliament. <br><br>It remains open to any member who wishes to propose a change to current arrangements to make representations to me and/or make a submission to the Procedure Committee.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1135 more like this
HL1136 more like this
HL1137 more like this
HL1139 more like this
HL1588 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.693Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.693Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
499
label Biography information for Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
387762
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
answering body
Leader of the House of Lords remove filter
answering dept id 92 more like this
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Leader of the House of Lords more like this
hansard heading House of Lords: Parliamentary Procedure more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Leader of the House whether the percentage of the vote cast for a political party at a general election is a consideration in deciding whether a political party is granted opposition front-bench speaking rights in the House of Lords. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Campbell-Savours more like this
uin HL1139 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The second largest opposition party is neither formally defined nor given specific speaking rights by the Standing Orders of the House or the Companion to the Standing Orders. The Companion to Standing Orders does, however, set out several areas where the “opposition front benches” have the right to speak for longer than backbenchers or have rights to speak at specific points in proceedings.<br><br>Of the political parties represented in the House, only the Official Opposition and the Liberal Democrat group operate frontbenches of a size that permits them to shadow each Government department. It is for that reason that the definition of “opposition frontbenches” that applied in practice before the 2010 Parliament has been reverted to in this Parliament. <br><br>It remains open to any member who wishes to propose a change to current arrangements to make representations to me and/or make a submission to the Procedure Committee.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1135 more like this
HL1136 more like this
HL1137 more like this
HL1138 more like this
HL1588 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.793Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T16:47:20.793Z
answering member
4205
label Biography information for Baroness Stowell of Beeston more like this
tabling member
499
label Biography information for Lord Campbell-Savours more like this