Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1125057
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading 101 Calls: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the total amount of charges to people for calls made to the 101 line was in each year since that line has been in operation. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 251240 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
answer text <p>The Home Office does not hold information on total amount of charges for calls to 101.</p><p>The Home Office is reviewing charges for the 101 non-emergency telephone number.</p><p>While it may not be an option for everyone, the public can also report non-emergency crimes online via forces’ websites, free of charge. The Home Office is supporting the digital transformation of policing through programmes such as the Digital Policing Portfolio (DPP), led by the NPCC. Within the DPP, the Digital Public Contact programme aims to provide appropriate digital channels for the public to report and track crime online, facilitating greater public-police interaction in real time.</p><p>The Home Office does not hold data on calls to 101 terminated by the caller.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner more like this
answering member printed Mr Nick Hurd more like this
grouped question UIN
251241 more like this
251242 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.577Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.577Z
answering member
1561
label Biography information for Mr Nick Hurd more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1125058
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading 101 Calls: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will make calls to the police on the non-emergency 101 number free of charge or require that all funds raised from those call charges be allocated towards frontline policing. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 251241 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
answer text <p>The Home Office does not hold information on total amount of charges for calls to 101.</p><p>The Home Office is reviewing charges for the 101 non-emergency telephone number.</p><p>While it may not be an option for everyone, the public can also report non-emergency crimes online via forces’ websites, free of charge. The Home Office is supporting the digital transformation of policing through programmes such as the Digital Policing Portfolio (DPP), led by the NPCC. Within the DPP, the Digital Public Contact programme aims to provide appropriate digital channels for the public to report and track crime online, facilitating greater public-police interaction in real time.</p><p>The Home Office does not hold data on calls to 101 terminated by the caller.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner more like this
answering member printed Mr Nick Hurd more like this
grouped question UIN
251240 more like this
251242 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.64Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.64Z
answering member
1561
label Biography information for Mr Nick Hurd more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1125062
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading 101 Calls more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many and what proportion of calls made to the police on the non-emergency 101 number are terminated by the caller while they are waiting for a person to answer that call. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 251242 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
answer text <p>The Home Office does not hold information on total amount of charges for calls to 101.</p><p>The Home Office is reviewing charges for the 101 non-emergency telephone number.</p><p>While it may not be an option for everyone, the public can also report non-emergency crimes online via forces’ websites, free of charge. The Home Office is supporting the digital transformation of policing through programmes such as the Digital Policing Portfolio (DPP), led by the NPCC. Within the DPP, the Digital Public Contact programme aims to provide appropriate digital channels for the public to report and track crime online, facilitating greater public-police interaction in real time.</p><p>The Home Office does not hold data on calls to 101 terminated by the caller.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner more like this
answering member printed Mr Nick Hurd more like this
grouped question UIN
251240 more like this
251241 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.67Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-13T16:33:02.67Z
answering member
1561
label Biography information for Mr Nick Hurd more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1122398
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-04-23more like thismore than 2019-04-23
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Merseyside Police: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what additional support he is providing to Merseyside Police to (a) tackle gun crime in Birkenhead and (b) prevent children and young people from being criminally exploited. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 246582 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
answer text <p>The Government is committed to tackling gun crime and is taking steps to address the issue across England and Wales. As set out in our Serious Violence Strategy, this includes measures in the Offensive Weapons Bill to ban certain rapid firing rifles and bump stocks, introducing greater regulation of antique firearms and tightening controls on firearms dealers. <br>We have also established a multi-agency national firearms threat assessment centre to improve our capability to disrupt the supply and use of illegal firearms; this unit works closely with Merseyside police and the North West Regional Organised Crime Unit.</p><p>The Government recognises the devastating impact of county lines activity on children and vulnerable people. We have provided £3.6 million to establish the new National County Lines Coordination Centre (NCLCC) to enhance our cross-border intelligence and activity on county lines and to better safeguard and protect victims of county lines including those who have been criminally exploited. Work is ongoing to protect the exploited and target the offenders, and to date the NCLCC has carried out two separate weeks of operational intensification leading to over 1100 arrests, over 1300 individuals safeguarded and significant seizures of weapons and drugs.</p><p>In addition, the Government is providing Merseyside with £700k funding over two years through our £22 million Early Intervention Youth Fund for an early interventions programme targeting young people aged 8-19 to tackle serious violence and criminal exploitation across Merseyside. We have also allocated £3.5 million to Merseyside Police from our serious violence fund to pay for increased operational activity aimed at reducing serious violence.</p><p>Since 2018, the Home Office has funded a Serious and Organised Crime Community Coordinator programme in Merseyside. The programme consists of a mix of techniques with the aim of reducing serious and organised crime, reducing its impact on local communities, and protecting the most vulnerable members of society from criminal exploitation.</p><p>Funding for Merseyside Police will increase by £18.3 million this year. The Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner has set out her plans to use this funding to recruit 80 more police officers.</p>
answering member constituency Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner more like this
answering member printed Mr Nick Hurd more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-04-29T13:25:48.79Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T13:25:48.79Z
answering member
1561
label Biography information for Mr Nick Hurd more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1052309
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-31more like thismore than 2019-01-31
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Home Office: Employment Tribunals Service more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many times his Department, excluding executive agencies and non-ministerial departments, was taken to an employment tribunal for disability discrimination in 2017-18. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 215108 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-08more like thismore than 2019-02-08
answer text <p>For the year 2017-18, the Home Office was involved in 20 Employment Tribunals where disability discrimination was an aspect of the claim.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-08T12:05:20.417Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-08T12:05:20.417Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1050051
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-28more like thismore than 2019-01-28
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Asylum: Slavery more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many victims of slavery who are no longer receiving support through the asylum system (a) have applied for a subsistence rate back payment and (b) are yet to apply for a back payment. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 213236 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-31more like thismore than 2019-01-31
answer text <p>Government is making every effort to pay back everyone affected by the subsistence rate contract changes for asylum-seeking victims of modern slavery made in March 2018.</p><p>Based on the current data, we have identified 1,208 potential victims of trafficking that have been affected and are entitled to back payments. 989 of those affected are still in both National Referral Mechanism (NRM) and asylum support, 150 are no longer in NRM support but are still in asylum support, and 69 are no longer in either NRM or asylum support.</p><p>On 24 January 2019, personalised letters were sent out to all those we identified as being affected and eligible for repayments. For those still in support, the letters detailed how much and how they will be paid. For those who have left support, the letters explained how to apply for these pay-ments.</p><p>If an individual believes they are eligible but does not receive a letter, they can complete an application form on gov.uk. There is no closing date for when people can apply for back payments if they think they are eligible. Further information is available on gov.uk (<a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-subsistence-rates-back-payment-victims-of-modern-slavery" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-subsistence-rates-back-payment-victims-of-modern-slavery</a>).</p><p>We are not releasing the number of people who have already applied through the application form on gov.uk as this is an ongoing process and we will be working with these individuals to ensure those who are eligible are paid.</p>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
grouped question UIN 213237 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-31T17:32:55.94Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-31T17:32:55.94Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1050052
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-28more like thismore than 2019-01-28
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Asylum: Slavery more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many and what proportion of victims of slavery who are due a subsistence rate back payment are no longer receiving support through the asylum system. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 213237 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-31more like thismore than 2019-01-31
answer text <p>Government is making every effort to pay back everyone affected by the subsistence rate contract changes for asylum-seeking victims of modern slavery made in March 2018.</p><p>Based on the current data, we have identified 1,208 potential victims of trafficking that have been affected and are entitled to back payments. 989 of those affected are still in both National Referral Mechanism (NRM) and asylum support, 150 are no longer in NRM support but are still in asylum support, and 69 are no longer in either NRM or asylum support.</p><p>On 24 January 2019, personalised letters were sent out to all those we identified as being affected and eligible for repayments. For those still in support, the letters detailed how much and how they will be paid. For those who have left support, the letters explained how to apply for these pay-ments.</p><p>If an individual believes they are eligible but does not receive a letter, they can complete an application form on gov.uk. There is no closing date for when people can apply for back payments if they think they are eligible. Further information is available on gov.uk (<a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-subsistence-rates-back-payment-victims-of-modern-slavery" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-subsistence-rates-back-payment-victims-of-modern-slavery</a>).</p><p>We are not releasing the number of people who have already applied through the application form on gov.uk as this is an ongoing process and we will be working with these individuals to ensure those who are eligible are paid.</p>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
grouped question UIN 213236 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-31T17:32:55.987Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-31T17:32:55.987Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1045995
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Home Office: Cleaning Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which service providers are contracted to carry out third party cleaning contracts for his (a) Department and (b) executive agencies; if he will list all of the services delivered by third party contractors to his (i) Department and (ii) executive agencies; and how many people working for those third party contractors are paid less than the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 211157 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-28more like thismore than 2019-01-28
answer text <p>Cleaning services for the Home Office and its executive agencies are out-sourced. The cleaning services for the majority of the Home Office estate are contracted out to Interserve and OCS. The cleaning of the department’s headquarters at 2 Marsham Street is the responsibility of the PFI provider. <br>The Home Office is not able to provide information regarding third party contractors and any sub-contractors to these without incurring dispropor-tionate cost, noting the wide range of services that could be in scope such as Overseas VACs, Transportation in IE/BF environment, provision for Premium Services and others</p><p>The Home Office does not hold data about what contractors pay</p><p>The Home Office requires all of its suppliers to comply with the legal mini-mum standards of pay as set out in the Government’s National Living Wage legislation. This is a contractual obligation on the supplier and is monitored through contract compliance mechanisms. We do not plan to require or stipulate in our contractual arrangements a requirement to meet the Living Wage Foundation’s rates.</p>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-28T12:20:50.933Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-28T12:20:50.933Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1045701
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-21more like thismore than 2019-01-21
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Home Office: Disability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what proportion of staff in his Department including those employed in executive agencies and non-ministerial Departments declared a disability in 2017-18. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 210483 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-29more like thismore than 2019-01-29
answer text <p>The 2018 Annual Civil Service Employment Survey showed that as at 31 March 2018, the proportion of Home Office staff who declared a disability is 8.9%.</p><p><strong>Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC):</strong></p><p>As at 31 March 2018, figures for staff who have declared a disability are as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Disability</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>996</p></td><td><p>95.4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Yes</p></td><td><p>48</p></td><td><p>4.6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>total</p></td><td><p>1044</p></td><td><p>100%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>College of Policing:</strong></p><p> </p><p>The table below summarises the makeup of the College at 31 March 2018. This includes secondees and contractors in addition to College staff.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Disability </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Volume</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>% total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disability declared</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>3.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No disability</p></td><td><p>301</p></td><td><p>46.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Prefer not to say</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>2.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown/blank</p></td><td><p>307</p></td><td><p>47.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>total</p></td><td><p>643</p></td><td><p>100</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Gangmasters &amp; Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA): </strong></p><p> </p><p>1.63% of employees (FTE) declared a disability in 2017/18.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Security Industry Authority (SIA):</strong></p><p> </p><p>3.92% of the total staff headcount declared a disability in 2017/18.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC):</strong></p><p> </p><p>1.88% of employees (FTE) declared a disability in 2017/18.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Disclosure &amp; Barring Service (DBS):</strong></p><p> </p><p>6.94% of the total staff headcount declared a disability in 2017/18</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-29T15:20:39.213Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-29T15:20:39.213Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this
1038417
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-09more like thismore than 2019-01-09
answering body
Home Office remove filter
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants: Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of waiving the Immigration Health Surcharge for non-EEA nursing staff. more like this
tabling member constituency Birkenhead remove filter
tabling member printed
Frank Field more like this
uin 206744 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-17more like thismore than 2019-01-17
answer text <p>The Government fully recognises the contribution that international healthcare professionals, including nurses, make to the UK and to our health service, but we are not convinced it would be appropriate to waive the immigration health surcharge for this group.</p><p>Other providers of public services, such as teachers, are required to pay the charge and it is only right that those who come to the UK for more than six months who will not have built up the same connection contribute to the running of the NHS. It is important to remember that the charge offers access to health care services that are more comprehensive and often at lower cost than many other countries. The income generated by surcharge payments goes directly to NHS services, helping to protect and sustain our world-class healthcare system for everyone who uses it.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Romsey and Southampton North more like this
answering member printed Caroline Nokes more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-17T16:17:12.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-17T16:17:12.827Z
answering member
4048
label Biography information for Caroline Nokes more like this
tabling member
478
label Biography information for Lord Field of Birkenhead more like this