Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1037592
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Hospitals: Nurses more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether there is a legal limit on the ratio of nurses to patients on wards in NHS hospitals in England; and if so, what are those limits. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Clark of Windermere more like this
uin HL12650 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>The National Health Service does not have a legal ratio of nurses to patients.</p><p>Appropriate staffing levels are the responsibility of commissioners and trusts. The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 include a requirement for the deployment of sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons at all times.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:02:02.133Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:02:02.133Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
525
label Biography information for Lord Clark of Windermere more like this
1037602
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Adrenaline Auto-injectors more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many adrenaline auto-injectors they estimate will be needed over the next 12 months to ensure that no patient dies as a result of lacking such a device. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff more like this
uin HL12658 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>Based on available data sources (IMS, company supplied figures and NHS Prescription Cost Analysis Data), we estimate that approximately 900,000 adrenaline auto-injectors were issued throughout 2017 across the United Kingdom. Analysis of year on year data suggests an upward trend in the number of devices supplied, so the required volume is likely to exceed 900,000 in 2019.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:01:04.197Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:01:04.197Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
3609
label Biography information for Baroness Finlay of Llandaff more like this
1037603
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Neurology more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to improve services for people with neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Gale more like this
uin HL12659 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>NHS England established the National Neurology Advisory Group (NNAG) with the Neurological Alliance which led the development of a national collaborative clinical leadership model, bringing together key stakeholders such as Parkinson’s UK, a range of national clinical leaders and patient groups with the aim to seek alignment between programmes in NHS England, arm’s length bodies and system partners and to guide the strategic development of work to improve outcomes for people living with neurological conditions including Parkinson’s.</p><p>Throughout 2018, the NNAG has organised a number of condition specific meetings with the aim of defining what good neurology looks like for patients with neurological conditions including Parkinson’s, and identifying the barriers to achieving that.</p><p>NHS England also supports local transformation through their national programmes, as highlighted in the NHS Long Term Plan. NHS RightCare has published a number of intelligence tools and resources to support reduction in unwarranted variation in neurology services. For 2018/19, 37 of 195 clinical commissioning groups submitted delivery plans that include neurological problems as improvement projects as part of their NHS RightCare programmes. Of these 37, six systems have explicitly referenced Parkinson’s in their delivery plans. Interventions in these plans primarily focus on ensuring that patients are linked into end of life care recording and reviewing effective primary prescribing of Parkinson’s disease drugs.</p><p>NHS England Specialised Commissioning has also recently approved a national review of specialised adult neuroscience services, working alongside and closely with the Getting It Right First Time programme.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:06:58.13Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:06:58.13Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
2503
label Biography information for Baroness Gale more like this
1037606
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Health Services: Foreign Nationals more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many written submissions they have received as part of the review of the National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017; how many case studies were submitted to the review where urgent care was withheld; and what assessment they have made of the number of case studies submitted where urgent care was, or may have, been incorrectly withheld. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath more like this
uin HL12662 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>The Department engaged with 79 organisations as part of the process of reviewing of the National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations 2017 and received 57 formal responses. Of these, 22 case studies included instances where individuals were required to make advance payment for treatment that the Department has concluded was arguably, on proper analysis, immediately necessary and/or urgent.</p><p>The common issue in these cases is that clinicians have not fully taken into account the date at which those seeking treatment have been expected to leave the United Kingdom, something that national guidance is clear must be taken into consideration when making a decision as to whether or not treatment is considered urgent. To mitigate this risk and help ensure the regulations are applied as intended the Department has updated its guidance, published on 24 December 2018, and is planning further updates to relevant training material and case studies in early 2019 to ensure all relevant circumstances are considered when deciding if a treatment is to be considered immediately necessary, urgent or non-urgent.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:03:35.98Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:03:35.98Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
2024
label Biography information for Lord Hunt of Kings Heath more like this
1037619
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Nurses: Labour Turnover more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the retention rate for new NHS nurses has increased in the last two years. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Redfern more like this
uin HL12673 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>Data relating to the retention of newly qualified nurses is not held centrally.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:07:17.477Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:07:17.477Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
4551
label Biography information for Baroness Redfern more like this
1037620
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading NHS: Negligence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Manzoor on 7 January (HL12528), how they format clinical negligence claims. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Storey more like this
uin HL12674 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>NHS Resolution handles clinical negligence claims on behalf of National Health Service organisations and independent sector providers of NHS care in England.</p><p>NHS Resolution formats its clinical negligence claims using a coding system.</p><p>NHS Resolution has advised that it codes claims under its management to identify whether formal court proceedings have commenced. However, the reasons for this can be multiple and complex, i.e. a dispute on breach of duty, causation, the amount due to be paid in compensation, the imminent expiry of the limitation period, a combination of all four, or alternatively, the need for court approval of a settlement. Given this, and the fact that the claimant’s reasons for commencing court proceedings may not be shared with NHS Resolution, the reasons for commencement are not coded separately.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:18:11.193Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:18:11.193Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
4238
label Biography information for Lord Storey more like this
1037627
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Cervical Cancer: Screening more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the uptake in cervical smear tests; how they will encourage women to take such tests; and how they will increase the availability of such tests. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Tonge more like this
uin HL12680 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>NHS England has reviewed the data from 2013 showing the gradual national and international decline in the five-year coverage. Assessments for the decline were done in partnership with key stakeholders Public Health England (PHE) and Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust.</p><p>Following Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust report published in January 2018, NHS England and PHE have modified the commissioning levers and communication processes, for example through supporting Jo’s Trust in the Time to Screen campaign and the launch of its first national multimedia cervical screening campaign ‘Be Clear on Cancer’ in March 2019 promoting uptake of cervical screening.</p><p>NHS England has supported the Cancer Alliances who bring together local senior clinical and managerial leaders representing the whole cancer patient pathway across a specific geography, and have a general role in improving early diagnosis. In turn they have developed specific plans to improve uptake rates in screening programmes as part of that agenda with cervical screening considered a priority area.</p><p>Cancer Research UK and Macmillan general practitioners (GPs) are also being utilised to provide awareness and training, with work and focus groups to target reducing inequalities among women over 50 and women from Eastern European countries a specific focus in one region.</p><p>Training of GP receptionists is underway to improve ease of access to a screening appointment, while a toolkit has been developed to reduce the inequality in uptake among women with a learning disability. In addition, NHS England recently announced that Professor Sir Mike Richards has been asked to lead a review of cancer screening programmes which will consider ways to increase uptake of cervical screening and the NHS Long Term Plan confirms that using human papillomavirus testing as the primary screen for cervical cancer will be implemented across England by 2020.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:00:29.757Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:00:29.757Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
200
label Biography information for Baroness Tonge more like this
1037634
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Prescription Drugs more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, in relation to the proposed changes to the Human Medicines Regulation 2012, as outlined in the document Further guidance note on the regulation of medicines, medical devices and clinical trials if there’s no Brexit deal, published on 4 January, what assessment they have made of whether allowing pharmacists to lead on medicines substitution and override physicians would (1) reduce the transparency of communication across the health system about medicines supplied, (2) confuse patients and physicians, and (3) affect the quality of care delivered by the NHS; and whether those proposed changes are consistent with the outcome of the public consultation on automatic generic substitution in 2010. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Warner more like this
uin HL12686 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>Community pharmacists have an important role in ensuring that patient get the medicines they need. If a serious shortage protocol is in place they can dispense an alternative but only as prescribed in the protocol.</p><p>A protocol would increase the transparency of communication across the health system and reduce confusion amongst patients and prescribers as the protocol will give prescribers clarity about what will happen in the event a prescription only medicine is unavailable.</p><p>A protocol would support the quality of care delivered by the National Health Service. In particular, in a situation with multiple large shortages, serious shortages protocols can have an important role in reducing delays in getting patients their medicines and freeing up general practitioners’ time.</p><p>The serious shortage protocol provisions would enable retail pharmacies to provide a generic medicine when the brand has been prescribed but only if there is a serious shortage of that particular branded medicine and only if the protocol, developed with and signed off by clinicians, allows for the substitution. This is not automatic generic substitution of branded medicines by retail pharmacies which is currently not allowed and the Department has no plans to change this.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T16:05:50.7Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T16:05:50.7Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
1732
label Biography information for Lord Warner more like this
1037635
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading NHS: Drugs more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government why the proposed changes to the Human Medicines Regulation 2012, as outlined in the document Further guidance note on the regulation of medicines, medical devices and clinical trials if there’s no Brexit deal, published on 4 January, will not be subject to the affirmative instrument procedure. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Warner more like this
uin HL12687 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-22more like thismore than 2019-01-22
answer text <p>The proposed changes to the Human Medicines Regulation 2012 will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure in accordance with paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 7 to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 for it to be exercisable in the United Kingdom. The Statutory Instrument will be laid before Parliament very soon.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Manzoor more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-22T15:57:48.957Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-22T15:57:48.957Z
answering member
4289
label Biography information for Baroness Manzoor more like this
tabling member
1732
label Biography information for Lord Warner more like this
1037772
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-08more like thismore than 2019-01-08
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care remove filter
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Learning Disabilities Mortality Review Programme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Learning Disabilities Mortality Review report published by the University of Bristol, whether his Department is taking steps to address the recommendations of that report. more like this
tabling member constituency Slough more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
uin 206447 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-16more like thismore than 2019-01-16
answer text <p>The Government’s response to the Learning Disabilities Mortality Review Programme (LeDeR) report, published on 12 September 2018, identifies actions for the Department, as well as NHS England and other partners, to address the national recommendations in the LeDeR report.</p><p> </p><p>The Department and its partners continue to make progress towards implementing these actions, to improve support for people with learning disabilities across the health and care system, reduce health inequalities and improve health and wellbeing outcomes.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Gosport more like this
answering member printed Caroline Dinenage more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-16T12:20:39.787Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-16T12:20:39.787Z
answering member
4008
label Biography information for Dame Caroline Dinenage more like this
tabling member
4638
label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this