Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

717270
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-03more like thismore than 2017-04-03
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Brighton Main Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they received the report by Chris Gibb into the performance failures on the Brighton Main Line, and when they intend to publish it unredacted. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6571 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-07more like thismore than 2017-04-07
answer text <p>Chris Gibb provided his technical advice to the Secretary of State for Transport on 30 December 2016. The advice will be published shortly, with limited redactions to protect legal and commercially sensitive information.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-07T12:13:34.593Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-07T12:13:34.593Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
715529
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-30more like thismore than 2017-03-30
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Network Rail: Land more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions have taken place between Network Rail and the Treasury regarding (1) the sale of operational land, (2) whether such sales would be leasehold or freehold, (3) what conditions would be applied to ensure the continuing use of such land for railway purposes, and (4) how much money is estimated could be raised from the sale of (a) rail freight terminals, (b) rail passenger stations, (c) commercial arches, and (d) operational rail tracks and lines. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6490 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-07more like thismore than 2017-04-07
answer text <p>The government holds regular discussions with Network Rail to discuss a wide range of topics, including the asset disposal programme. This programme is ongoing and the detail of any future sales are commercially sensitive.</p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury is engaged in these asset sales discussions, working through the Department for Transport, who manage the relationship between Network Rail and central government alongside UK Government Investments. Specifically, HM Treasury is represented on a Network Rail chaired meeting where potential sales of assets are discussed and where its input can be sought.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-07T12:17:25.057Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-07T12:17:25.057Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
715530
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-30more like thismore than 2017-03-30
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Highways England: Land more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the recently announced cost escalation of new or enhanced road projects by Highways England, whether any discussions have taken place between Highways England and the Treasury about (1) the sale of operational land, (2) whether such sales would be leasehold or freehold, (3) what conditions would be applied to ensure the continuing use of such land for road user purposes, and (4) how much money is estimated could be raised from the sale of (a) motorway service stations, (b) motorways, and (c) trunk roads. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6491 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-07more like thismore than 2017-04-07
answer text <p>I understand that no discussions have taken place between Highways England and the Treasury about the sale of operational land.</p><p> </p><p>Highways England own 21 Motorway Service Area sites and are currently looking at how to secure best value for the taxpayer from these sites.</p><p> </p><p>No estimates have been made from the sale of motorways or trunk roads.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-07T12:16:46.083Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-07T12:16:46.083Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
711575
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-15more like thismore than 2017-03-15
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed 2 Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the benefits of including the Handsacre connection from HS2 to the West Coast Main Line once HS2 Phase 2A is completed. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6081 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-23more like thismore than 2017-03-23
answer text <p>The inclusion of a link at Handsacre to allow HS2 trains to pass onto the West Coast Main Line is contained in the High Speed Rail (London to West Midlands) Act 2017. Furthermore, the Government has given a specific assurance to build the Handsacre link before the launch of Phase One services.</p><p> </p><p>The Phase 2a strategic outline business case, published in November 2015, includes Handsacre Junction in our assessment of the benefits of the 2a scheme, and the Full Y scheme. Handsacre Junction would allow us to serve stations along the West Coast Mainline such as Stafford. Government also sees the potential benefits of serving Stoke-on-Trent in support of the wider development plans of the Northern Gateway Development Zone and the ambitions of the Midlands Engine. The Secretary of State has therefore asked HS2 Ltd to take forward more detailed work on train planning for options to serve Stoke via Handsacre Junction, including operational feasibility in both 2027 and 2033.</p><p> </p><p>However, we do not break down the economic benefits of different parts of the scheme, including Handsacre Junction.</p>
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-23T11:51:01.967Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-23T11:51:01.967Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
711576
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-15more like thismore than 2017-03-15
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Airports more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government who is responsible for funding surface road and rail access to major airports in England. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6082 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-21more like thismore than 2017-03-21
answer text <p>The Government expects, as set out in the Aviation Policy Framework 2013, the cost of any surface access works required solely to enable airport expansion to be met by the promoter.</p><p> </p><p>Where proposed projects have wider beneficiaries, the Government will expect the airport operator to fund an appropriate proportion of the costs based on the direct benefits for the airport.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-21T12:30:42.293Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-21T12:30:42.293Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
711185
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-14more like thismore than 2017-03-14
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed 2 Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 9 March (HL5562), what assessment they have made of advice from SNCF quoted in the March edition of Railway Gazette International that operating above 320 km/h incurs significantly higher track maintenance costs. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6073 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-23more like thismore than 2017-03-23
answer text <p>HS2 Ltd has collaborated with several high speed rail Infrastructure Managers, including SNCF, to ascertain the implications of running trains at 360km/h.</p><p> </p><p>Using recommendations based on experiences of managing High Speed Lines in Europe, HS2 Ltd intends to incorporate specific components in the track design which will improve the system performance whilst utilising an Infrastructure Management System that determines asset performance and condition at all times.</p><p> </p><p>The combination of these factors and the use of innovative maintenance activities, that go beyond current best practice, should reduce the maintenance implications of running at these speeds.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-23T11:47:12.827Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-23T11:47:12.827Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
710389
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-13more like thismore than 2017-03-13
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed 2 Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 9 March (HL5562), how, assuming that signalling is designed appropriately for the relevant speed, operating at a speed of 320km/h rather than 360km/h would reduce capacity on the high speed line. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL5993 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-23more like thismore than 2017-03-23
answer text <p>Reducing the maximum speed of trains from 360km/h to 320km/h would result in trains taking longer to complete their overall journey. This means that, unless we buy more train sets, we will not able to run as many train services on HS2 and therefore capacity will be reduced.</p><p> </p><p>In my previous answer [HL5562], reduced capacity was also in the context of running tilting trains at 300km/h on the HS2 network. Mixing tilting trains running at 300km/h on HS2 with non-tilting trains running at 360km/h would also reduce capacity because it would reduce the number of train paths available per hour. Furthermore, the response to our market sounding of rolling stock manufacturers has indicated that <del class="ministerial">titling</del> <ins class="ministerial">tilting</ins> trains offer reduced seating capacity per train set compared with non-tilt.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-23T11:48:15.87Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-23T11:48:15.87Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2017-03-28T15:14:32.773Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-28T15:14:32.773Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
previous answer version
41850
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
710390
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-13more like thismore than 2017-03-13
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading West Coast Main Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 9 March (HL5562), whether the journey time of four hours and 17 minutes for the Pendolino to Glasgow allows for the same "minor line speed improvements on the northern West Coast Main Line" as for the four hour journey time quoted for Phase 1 non-tilt. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL5994 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-23more like thismore than 2017-03-23
answer text <p>The minor line speed improvements on the West Coast Main Line (WCML), mainly north of Preston, would increase the maximum permissible speed for non-tilting rolling stock to towards the maximum permissible speed for tilting rolling stock. These improvements would not therefore have any effect on the journey time of four hours and seventeen minutes for Pendolino services between London and Glasgow.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-23T11:50:04.217Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-23T11:50:04.217Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
709118
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-07more like thismore than 2017-03-07
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Heathrow Airport more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the requirements for surface access improvements to meet the demands of the third runway at Heathrow; what is their estimate of the cost of those improvements; and what is their policy on who will pay for them. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL5875 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-16more like thismore than 2017-03-16
answer text <p>The Government is currently consulting on a draft Airports National Policy Statement (NPS) which will set the framework for any planning process, should the NPS be designated. The draft NPS proposes targets to increase the number of airport users accessing the airport by public transport.</p><p> </p><p>As part of any planning application the promoter would need to set out in detail how it would achieve these targets as part of its plans for mitigating the impact of expansion.</p><p> </p><p>The Government expects, as set out in the Aviation Policy Framework 2013, the cost of any surface access works required solely to enable airport expansion to be met by the promoter.</p><p> </p><p>In the case of Heathrow expansion, this would mean that Heathrow Airport Limited, will meet the cost of the surface access improvements necessary to allow expansion of the airport, including re-alignment of the M25, the A4 and A3044, as well as airport and terminal access roads.</p><p> </p><p>Where proposed projects have wider beneficiaries, such as Western Rail Access and Southern Rail Access, the Government will expect Heathrow to fund an appropriate proportion of the costs based on the direct benefits for the airport.</p>
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-16T12:18:37.077Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-16T12:18:37.077Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter
708684
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-06more like thismore than 2017-03-06
answering body
Department for Transport remove filter
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed Two more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many HS2 Ltd staff (1) have previously worked for, and (2) are on secondment from, CH2M; how many of those staff have returned to work for CH2M after working at HS2 Ltd; and how many CH2M staff are located in HS2 Ltd offices. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL5815 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-16more like thismore than 2017-03-16
answer text <p>Twenty-five HS2 staff have previously worked for CH2M.</p><p>Thirty-seven CH2M staff are on secondment to HS2 Ltd.</p><p>HS2 Ltd does not hold information on the numbers of people who returned to CH2M after working for HS2 Ltd.</p><p>There are 84 CH2M people located in HS2 Ltd offices.</p><p>By way of context, HS2 Ltd’s total headcount is around 1,500.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-16T12:11:52.19Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-16T12:11:52.19Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley remove filter