Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

450538
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2016-02-03more like thismore than 2016-02-03
answering body
Department for Education remove filter
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Faith Schools: Admissions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consideration they have given to the finding of the report <i>An Unholy Mess</i>, published by the Fair Admissions Campaign and the British Humanist Association last year, that a number of religiously selective schools have asked parents for information about their occupational, marital, and financial status as part of the admissions process, and whether they consider this to be acceptable. more like this
tabling member printed
Viscount Ridley more like this
uin HL5900 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-18more like thismore than 2016-02-18
answer text <p>Many of the findings of the report by the Fair Admissions Campaign and British Humanist Association echo those reported by the Chief Schools Adjudicator in her Annual Report for the 2013/14 school year.</p><p>Admission authorities for all state-funded schools, including schools with a religious designation, are required to comply with the mandatory provisions of the School Admissions Code and other admissions law.</p><p>Where an objection is made to the Schools Adjudicator, if the arrangements are found to be unfair or fail to comply with the Code, the admission authority must make changes to ensure their arrangements are compliant. Where an admission authority fails to implement decisions of the adjudicator, the Secretary of State may direct the admission authority to do so.</p><p>We continue to keep the Code under review, and, where we consider any changes are necessary to make the admissions system work more effectively for parents, these will be subject to a full public consultation.</p>
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
grouped question UIN HL5901 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-18T16:54:48.077Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-18T16:54:48.077Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
4272
label Biography information for Viscount Ridley more like this
228718
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2015-03-19more like thismore than 2015-03-19
answering body
Department for Education remove filter
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading PE and Sport Premium more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government (1) whether they will publish their analysis of the impact of the introduction of the Sport Premium on promotion of the provision of physical education in primary schools and the details of how they have held primary schools accountable for spending the Sport Premium; (2) how many primary schools have benefited from the Sport Premium; and (3) whether they will list those schools which have failed to meet their guidelines for funding. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moynihan more like this
uin HL5900 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-03-25more like thismore than 2015-03-25
answer text <p>Through the primary physical education (PE) and sport premium, the Department for Education is providing over £450 million of ring-fenced funding across three academic years, until academic year 2015/16, to improve PE and sport. The independent research company, NatCen, is evaluating the impact, and assessing schools’ use of the premium. A research brief was published in September 2014, reporting an improvement in PE teaching in over 90% of cases. The interim report is available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pe-and-sport-premium-an-investigation-in-primary-schools" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pe-and-sport-premium-an-investigation-in-primary-schools</a>, and the full report will be published in autumn 2015.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Schools are held accountable for the way in which they spend their funding through Ofsted whole-school inspections. They are required to publish online reports detailing their spending plans and the impact of the primary PE and sport premium. Ofsted has strengthened its coverage of PE and sport, to ensure that all primary school inspections report on the extent to which the school is effectively using the premium to improve the quality and breadth of PE and sport provision.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The premium has been allocated to approximately 18,000 schools in academic year 2014/15. Information on the extent to which individual schools meet the conditions of the premium will be made public through Ofsted’s reporting on schools following section five inspections.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-03-25T16:48:41.9Zmore like thismore than 2015-03-25T16:48:41.9Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
924
label Biography information for Lord Moynihan more like this