Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

995532
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-10-26more like thismore than 2018-10-26
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Tidal Power: Cardiff Bay more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what the scientific reasons are for not continuing the Cardiff Bay Tidal Power scheme. more like this
tabling member constituency High Peak more like this
tabling member printed
Ruth George remove filter
uin 184404 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-05more like thismore than 2018-11-05
answer text <p>In his statement on Monday 25<sup>th</sup> June 2015, my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy informed Parliament that a value for money assessment if the proposed Swansea Bay Tidal Lagoon and the subsequent programme of lagoons (including the proposed Cardiff Bay lagoon) did not represent value for money for the tax payer and consumer.</p><p> </p><p>The summary value for money statement can be read at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/swansea-bay-tidal-lagoon-value-for-money-assessment.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Devizes more like this
answering member printed Claire Perry more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-05T10:48:17.693Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-05T10:48:17.693Z
answering member
3974
label Biography information for Claire Perry more like this
tabling member
4662
label Biography information for Ruth George more like this