Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

831117
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what discussions he has had with trustees of the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund on disinvestment from fossil fuels. more like this
tabling member constituency Edinburgh South more like this
tabling member printed
Ian Murray more like this
uin 125125 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-07more like thismore than 2018-03-07
answer text <p>I have had no such discussions. Investment decisions within the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund are a matter for the Trustees who receive professional advice regarding decisions on the management of scheme assets. Details of the schemes investments are set out each year in a published Annual Review.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-07T10:42:25.457Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-07T10:42:25.457Z
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
tabling member
3966
label Biography information for Ian Murray more like this
831179
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Carillion: Insolvency more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the level of the fixed fees being charged to public sector organisations by PwC as the liquidator of Carillion for providing continuity of services; what steps he is taking to minimise the effect on the public purse; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Barnsley East more like this
tabling member printed
Stephanie Peacock more like this
uin 125187 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-29more like thismore than 2018-03-29
answer text <p>PwC are not the Official Receivers. Information on the role of PwC within Carillion is held by the Insolvency Service who are the contracting authority for this work.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-29T10:06:23.547Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-29T10:06:23.547Z
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
previous answer version
38491
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
tabling member
4607
label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock more like this
831194
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading DHL more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, for what reasons DHL is no longer a strategic supplier to Government. more like this
tabling member constituency Hemsworth more like this
tabling member printed
Jon Trickett more like this
uin 125202 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-16more like thismore than 2018-03-16
answer text <p>DHL was removed from the list of strategic suppliers following a decision by the Commercial Relationship Board in the Cabinet Office to prioritise those suppliers with the highest levels of criticality and the greatest levels of cross government presence.</p><p> </p><p>The Government continually reviews its portfolio of strategic suppliers.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-16T14:19:06.45Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-16T14:19:06.45Z
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
previous answer version
38492
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
tabling member
410
label Biography information for Jon Trickett more like this
831195
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Crown Representatives: Conflict of Interests more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what guidance he has issued on the management of conflicts of interest in respect of Crown Representatives. more like this
tabling member constituency Hemsworth more like this
tabling member printed
Jon Trickett more like this
uin 125203 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-01more like thismore than 2018-02-01
answer text <p>Crown Representatives are subject to a conflict of interest process that is run every six months.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-01T14:21:44.857Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-01T14:21:44.857Z
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
previous answer version
38493
answering member constituency Hertsmere more like this
answering member printed Oliver Dowden more like this
answering member
4441
label Biography information for Oliver Dowden more like this
tabling member
410
label Biography information for Jon Trickett more like this
831205
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Carillion: Insolvency more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 25 January (HL4735), which Carillion contracts have had work suspended while an alternative provider contractor is found. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
uin HL5130 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-08more like thismore than 2018-02-08
answer text <p>The Official Receiver is conducting an orderly liquidation of the company. Our priority is the continuity of public services. Of the private sector service contracts, 90% of these services customers have indicated that they want Carillion to continue providing services in the interim until new suppliers can be found and will provide funding which enables the Official Receiver to retain the employees working on those contracts.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-08T17:07:24.037Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-08T17:07:24.037Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
3504
label Biography information for Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
831206
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Carillion: Insolvency more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 25 January (HL4735), which Carillion contracts encountered problems with continuity and mitigation for service failures; and what estimate they have made of the additional and continuity costs to Her Majesty's Government. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
uin HL5131 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-20more like thismore than 2018-02-20
answer text <p>Public sector services contracts have maintained continuity without any significant disruption. Construction contracts have had to be made safe and secure and new contractors will be appointed as soon as possible to continue the works. Public sector bodies will continue to pay for the cost of the services that Carillion were providing as they usually would have done to Carillion. HMT have provided working capital to the Official Receiver in order for him to continue to run the public sector services provided by Carillion. Any proceeds from the sales of assets will offset these costs therefore the full cost is not yet known.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-20T14:07:30.897Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-20T14:07:30.897Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
3504
label Biography information for Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
831207
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-01-26
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Carillion: Insolvency more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 25 January (HL4734), which Carillion contracts had a contingency plan put in place; what were the dates when such contingency plans became operable; what was the additional cost to Her Majesty's Government of each contingency plan; and which contracts did not execute a contingency plan. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
uin HL5132 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-20more like thismore than 2018-02-20
answer text <p>The continuation of public services has and continues to be our primary focus. To that end, robust contingency plans have been developed by departments as part of routine contract management. Contingency plans for Carillion contracts were enacted once the decision was taken by the company to enter insolvency on 15 January.</p><p>Project-level costs are not held centrally, but HM Treasury announced that it was providing £154m to the Official Receiver. It is too early to assess what the final financial position will be.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-20T14:06:21.167Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-20T14:06:21.167Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
3504
label Biography information for Lord Bassam of Brighton more like this
830456
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-25more like thismore than 2018-01-25
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Presidents Club more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will (a) commission an investigation into how a lunch engagement with the Foreign Secretary came to be auctioned at the Presidents Club dinner of 18 January 2018 and (b) the findings of that investigation. more like this
tabling member constituency Bishop Auckland more like this
tabling member printed
Helen Goodman more like this
uin 125022 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-08more like thismore than 2018-03-08
answer text <p>The Foreign Secretary had not agreed to support this event and knew nothing of his inclusion in the auction. The offer was not authorised and will not take place.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Norwich North more like this
answering member printed Chloe Smith more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-08T16:26:07.703Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-08T16:26:07.703Z
answering member
1609
label Biography information for Chloe Smith more like this
tabling member
1484
label Biography information for Helen Goodman more like this
830477
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-25more like thismore than 2018-01-25
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Thames Tideway Tunnel more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government on what criteria the Infrastructure and Project Authority concluded that the Thames Tideway Tunnel no longer requires its oversight and reporting. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL5093 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-21more like thismore than 2018-02-21
answer text <p>The Thames Tideway Tunnel is not a Government project and would therefore not normally be subject to IPA oversight and monitoring. However, given the scale and nature of the project, it was decided that IPA would provide oversight and assurance for the set-up of the project.</p><p>The IPA confirmed that the conditions were right to return the project to DEFRA assurance through a Project Assessment Review in May 2016 and formally returned responsibility in 2017. This was only done once IPA were content that DEFRA had strong and appropriate assurance in place to ensure HMG’s interests were protected, and was documented through an exchange of letters between the CEO of the IPA and the DEFRA Accounting Officer.</p><p>Although no longer on the Government major projects portfolio, DEFRA and IPA continue to work closely together on the project.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-21T14:54:17.743Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-21T14:54:17.743Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
830512
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-25more like thismore than 2018-01-25
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Public Sector: Procurement more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the EU Commission Notice issued on 10 January stating that EU public procurement rules will cease to apply to the UK from 30 March 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
The Earl of Kinnoull more like this
uin HL5116 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-08more like thismore than 2018-02-08
answer text <p>The December guidelines published by the European Council point to the shared desire of the EU and the UK to make rapid progress on an implementation period, with formal talks beginning very soon. We have been clear that this should be based on the existing structure of EU rules and regulations, during which the UK and the EU would continue to have access to one another’s markets on current terms.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-08T17:02:26.87Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-08T17:02:26.87Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
4354
label Biography information for The Earl of Kinnoull more like this