Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

753905
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-07-19
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Constituencies more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, in the light of the speech by the then Leader of the Conservative Party on 8 September 2009 linking the issue of cutting the cost of politics to the proposal to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 585, what recent estimate they have made of the annual savings that will result from the implementation of that reduction. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rennard more like this
uin HL1051 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government's manifesto re-affirms the commitment to deliver equal and updated boundaries.</p><p>The current boundary review is proceeding in accordance with legislation passed in the 2010-15. The Boundary Commissions are required to submit their final reports in September 2018.</p><p>It is estimated that the reduction in the number of MPs will save approximately £13.1 million each year.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Young of Cookham more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T14:33:15.71Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T14:33:15.71Z
answering member
57
label Biography information for Lord Young of Cookham more like this
tabling member
2484
label Biography information for Lord Rennard more like this
753937
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-07-19
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Iraq Committee of Inquiry more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what lessons they have learned from the duration and cost of the Chilcot Inquiry. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Truscott more like this
uin HL1083 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>A number of lessons about inquiry processes were learned from the Iraq Inquiry, and government has absorbed these so that future inquiries can benefit from the experience. Government has received the report of Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee on the Iraq Inquiry, and will be responding in due course, setting out the lessons learned.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:56:33.7Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:56:33.7Z
answering member
4580
label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
tabling member
3682
label Biography information for Lord Truscott more like this
753947
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-07-19
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Government Departments: Correspondence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Lord Young of Cookham on 11 July (HLWS37), what steps they have taken to seek explanations from Ministers and Agency Chief Executives in (1) the Department for Communities and Local Government, (2) the Department for Education, (3) the Home Office, (4) HM Revenue and Customs, and (5) Ofwat, in the light of the Minister's response that they have failed to answer one third of the correspondence within the target set for replies. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jopling more like this
uin HL1094 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Government takes seriously its responsibilities for providing timely replies to correspondence from MPs and Peers. The Departments in question are committed to improving their performance on replying to correspondence from MPs and Peers and have plans in place to do so.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:56:14.663Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:56:14.663Z
answering member
4580
label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
tabling member
883
label Biography information for Lord Jopling more like this
753340
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-18more like thismore than 2017-07-18
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen on 26 October (HL2496) and 8 November 2016 (HL2803), what progress they have made in creating an online electoral registration checking tool to assist people seeking to know whether or not they are already registered, and to reduce the number of duplicate registrations. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rennard more like this
uin HL1028 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government has no plans to create an online electoral registration checking tool. Registers are held locally rather than centrally. There would be major technical, security and privacy issues around consolidating the registers to allow a live registration check, especially given that a checking tool would require an elector to prove their identity in the course of making an application. The investment costs required to overcome these barriers would significantly outweigh the cost of processing duplicates.</p><p>The Government nevertheless recognises that duplicate registrations represent a burden to administrators and that this may be the case in particular at the time of major elections. We are currently examining evidence collected during the recent general election to understand the scale of this issue and to identify more practicable solutions than a checking tool. For example, there may be the potential for improvements to the online journey to reduce duplicates. It may also be possible to exploit electoral management software systems to improve duplicate processing. The Government is taking forward this work with the Association of Electoral Administrators, the Scottish Assessors Association and the Electoral Commission.</p><p>At the same time, it is clear that online registration has led to a boost in registration levels. Compared to other means of increasing registration, such as the issuing of Household Notification Letters in advance of polls, online registration is highly cost efficient, even accounting for duplicate applications.</p>
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:54:14.18Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:54:14.18Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
2484
label Biography information for Lord Rennard more like this
753341
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-18more like thismore than 2017-07-18
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which detecting incidents of the same person voting more than once in the same election from different addresses will (1) require the creation of a national database based on collating the local electoral registers as maintained by each Electoral Registration Officer, (2) compilation of the marked registers from each election in electronic format, and (3) enabling such information to be used by those investigating such allegations more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rennard more like this
uin HL1029 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Voting more than once at a General Election is a crime which carries an unlimited financial penalty. Any evidence of an individual who is suspected to have voted twice at the General Election should be reported to the Police for investigation. In addition, the presiding officer at a polling station may ask any elector if they have already voted, and may withhold a ballot paper from an elector if they do not answer the question satisfactorily. The electoral register is marked to record the issuing of ballot papers to individuals at polling stations; there are electronic records of the issuing of postal votes representing an equivalent to the marked register for some electors. These records can already assist with an investigation should any voting irregularities be suspected.</p><p>There are a number of significant technical and practical barriers, as well as security and privacy concerns, relating to implementing a national electoral registration database. The Government has no plans to create such a database.</p>
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
grouped question UIN HL1030 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:52:14.813Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:52:14.813Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
2484
label Biography information for Lord Rennard more like this
753342
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-18more like thismore than 2017-07-18
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which the prevention of multiple voting in the same election by the same person using different addresses may require a change to the electoral registration process such that an individual may only be included on a particular register for a general election, regional assembly or referendum from somewhere other than their sole address, if that individual has been resident at that alternative address on most days in the preceding year more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rennard more like this
uin HL1030 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Voting more than once at a General Election is a crime which carries an unlimited financial penalty. Any evidence of an individual who is suspected to have voted twice at the General Election should be reported to the Police for investigation. In addition, the presiding officer at a polling station may ask any elector if they have already voted, and may withhold a ballot paper from an elector if they do not answer the question satisfactorily. The electoral register is marked to record the issuing of ballot papers to individuals at polling stations; there are electronic records of the issuing of postal votes representing an equivalent to the marked register for some electors. These records can already assist with an investigation should any voting irregularities be suspected.</p><p>There are a number of significant technical and practical barriers, as well as security and privacy concerns, relating to implementing a national electoral registration database. The Government has no plans to create such a database.</p>
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
grouped question UIN HL1029 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:52:14.877Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:52:14.877Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
2484
label Biography information for Lord Rennard more like this
753343
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-18more like thismore than 2017-07-18
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which the form of identification accompanying a postal vote should be amended to also require signed confirmation (1) that the ballot paper has been completed only by the person entitled to do so, (2) that this has been done, together with the sealing of the ballot paper in the envelope provided, in conditions of privacy, and (3) that the envelope was returned directly by that person to a Post Box, the Electoral Registration Officer/Returning Officer, or to a polling station on polling day, save only for those people requiring assistance from someone such as a carer, and as is necessary on the grounds of disability more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rennard more like this
uin HL1031 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>There are already measures in place designed to safeguard the security of postal voting, including the use of personal identifiers by postal voters. Sir Eric Pickles’ review of electoral fraud, published in 2016, considered postal voting and identified a number of areas in which the existing rules around postal voting could be tightened. The Government responded to the review, addressing each of its recommendations in turn, and setting out a number of measures for tackling the risk of fraud.</p><p>The Government is continuing to consider how to improve the integrity of postal voting and electoral processes in general, and will keep these matters under review.</p> more like this
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:52:47.317Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:52:47.317Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
2484
label Biography information for Lord Rennard more like this
752477
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-17more like thismore than 2017-07-17
answering body
Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text Her Majesty's Government, in the light of the instruction included on the 2016 London Mayoral election that voters should “Vote once [x] in column A for your first choice, and Vote once [x] in column B for your second choice”, whether they instructed the returning officers for (1) that election, and (2) other mayoral elections, to make it clear to voters that they must vote both for a first choice and for a second choice candidate; if so, on what basis that instruction was given; and whether they intend to review their instructions for future mayoral elections. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill more like this
uin HL923 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government did not issue instructions to Returning Officers for the May 2016 London Mayoral and other mayoral elections to inform voters they must vote for a first choice and second choice candidate. The instruction on the ballot paper reflects how the supplementary vote works but it is for the voter to decide who they wish to vote for and whether they want to vote for one, two or any candidates. The Government is happy to consider any additional information on how to complete a ballot paper for polls using the supplementary vote system but, as was said in our manifesto, we are keen to move to the First Past the Post system for such polls which we think will be clearer and easier for electors to use.</p> more like this
answering member printed The Earl of Courtown more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-09-06T12:55:39.07Zmore like thismore than 2017-09-06T12:55:39.07Z
answering member
3359
label Biography information for The Earl of Courtown more like this
tabling member
4214
label Biography information for Lord Palmer of Childs Hill more like this