Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1313240
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2021-05-11more like thismore than 2021-05-11
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will review her Department’s No Recourse to Public Funds policy in light of the High Court ruling of 29 April 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
tabling member printed
Neil Coyle more like this
uin 267 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-19more like thismore than 2021-05-19
answer text <p>The policy of No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) has been upheld by successive governments and maintains that those seeking to establish their family life in the UK must do so on a basis that prevents burdens on the taxpayer and promotes integration.</p><p>In the case of ST vs SSHD the High Court dismissed five of the six grounds raised by the claimant challenging the lawfulness of the policy. We are currently reflecting on the judgment in relation to our child welfare responsibilities.</p><p>People with leave under family and human rights routes can already apply, free of charge, to have the no recourse to public funds condition lifted.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN 266 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-19T09:53:57.947Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-19T09:53:57.947Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4368
label Biography information for Neil Coyle more like this