Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1300694
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Financial Institutions: Disclosure of Information more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps his Department has taken to ensure that banks, building societies and other financial institutions report accurate financial data to HMRC; and what redress is available in the event of financial institutions’ non-compliance. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Zarah Sultana more like this
uin 165686 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-17more like thismore than 2021-03-17
answer text <p>Banks, building societies and other financial institutions are required to provide a variety of information returns to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) on an accurate and timely basis. They are subject to HMRC’s usual compliance processes and if the information provided is late or found to be inaccurate following a compliance check, the taxpayer may be subject to penalties.</p><p> </p><p>The UK’s largest businesses, which includes many financial institutions, are subject to an enhanced risk review, as part of HMRC’s Business Risk Review process.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to this, over 98% of banks and building societies are signatories to the Code of Practice on Taxation for Banks. Their commitments under the Code include complying with their tax obligations, which include providing accurate information to HMRC, as well as maintaining a transparent relationship with HMRC. If a signatory is found to be in breach of these commitments, HMRC are able to disclose this, naming the bank in their annual report on the Code.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-17T13:52:45.847Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-17T13:52:45.847Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4786
label Biography information for Zarah Sultana more like this
1300767
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Freeports: Yorkshire and the Humber more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Humber Freeport bid included commitments to maintain existing collective bargaining agreements with trade unions organising seafarers working on merchant ships working from Hull port; and if he will place a copy of that bid in the Library. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull East more like this
tabling member printed
Karl Turner more like this
uin 165510 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
answer text <p>The government is pleased to have announced the locations of 8 new English Freeports at Budget. The Ministry for Housing, Communities &amp; Local Government will shortly publish the rationale behind the selection of these Freeport locations according to the process laid out in the Prospectus.</p><p> </p><p>Successful bidders will be confirmed subject to a business case review, agreement of governance arrangements, and the fulfilment of the appropriate authorisations.</p><p> </p><p>Freeports are not deregulatory and the government will ensure that the UK’s high standards with respect to workers’ rights will not be compromised.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
grouped question UIN 165511 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-15T10:36:57.83Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-15T10:36:57.83Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
4030
label Biography information for Karl Turner more like this
1300768
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Freeports more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will take steps to consult trade unions on (a) employment rights and (b) governance structures before the eight Freeports announced in the Budget statement on 3 March 2021 begin operating. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull East more like this
tabling member printed
Karl Turner more like this
uin 165511 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
answer text <p>The government is pleased to have announced the locations of 8 new English Freeports at Budget. The Ministry for Housing, Communities &amp; Local Government will shortly publish the rationale behind the selection of these Freeport locations according to the process laid out in the Prospectus.</p><p> </p><p>Successful bidders will be confirmed subject to a business case review, agreement of governance arrangements, and the fulfilment of the appropriate authorisations.</p><p> </p><p>Freeports are not deregulatory and the government will ensure that the UK’s high standards with respect to workers’ rights will not be compromised.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
grouped question UIN 165510 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-15T10:36:57.783Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-15T10:36:57.783Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
4030
label Biography information for Karl Turner more like this
1300776
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Freeports: Yorkshire and the Humber more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Education on the potential effect of the Humber Freeport on the availability of seafarer apprenticeships in (a) Hull and (b) the Humber region. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle more like this
tabling member printed
Emma Hardy more like this
uin 165656 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
answer text <p>The Chancellor has not met with the Secretary of State for Education to discuss Freeports since the bidding process closed on the 5 February, in line with the government’s commitment to the fair, open and transparent assessment process outlined in the Bidding Prospectus.</p><p> </p><p>Our focus has been on getting places to send us their bids and proposals, rather than second-guessing what they will do. The government will continue to work with successful bidders to help them achieve their objectives, across a variety of sectors.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-15T10:38:50.2Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-15T10:38:50.2Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
4645
label Biography information for Emma Hardy more like this
1300808
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Bounce Back Loan Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department had made of the potential merits of extending the zero interest period for Bounce Back Loans from 12 months to 18 months to allow for all covid-19 lockdown restrictions to have been lifted before the first businesses must begin paying interest. more like this
tabling member constituency York Outer more like this
tabling member printed
Julian Sturdy more like this
uin 165518 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>Under the Bounce Back Loan scheme, no repayments are due from the borrower for the first 12 months of the loan, giving businesses the breathing space they need during this difficult time. In addition, the Government covers the first 12 months of interest payments charged to the business by the lender.</p><p> </p><p>In order to give businesses further support and flexibility in making their repayments, the Chancellor has announced “Pay as You Grow” (PAYG) options. Under Pay as You Grow, following the end of the 12-month payment-free period, businesses can pause their repayments for six months – the interest in this case will accrue to the borrower, for payment later. This means that businesses can opt not to make any repayments on their Bounce Back loan for up to 18 months after they received the loan. Borrowers will also have the option to move temporarily to interest-only payments for periods of up to six months (an option which they can use up to three times), and to extend the term of their loan from six to ten years, reducing their monthly payments by almost half.</p><p> </p><p>Together, the 12-month payment holiday and interest-free period for borrowers, along with the PAYG options, form part of the Government’s unprecedented support package for businesses to protect jobs - including paying wages through the furlough schemes and self-employed support payments, generous grants, tax deferrals.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T09:21:16.95Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T09:21:16.95Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4079
label Biography information for Julian Sturdy more like this
1300824
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Financial Conduct Authority: Disclosure of Information more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what plans he has to ensure that the (a) Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and (b) Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) (i) make consumers aware of FCA Comp rule 7.4.1, (ii) do not financially disadvantage consumers by not disclosing that rule and (iii) compensate consumers in the event that they are financially disadvantaged as a result of not disclosing that rule. more like this
tabling member constituency Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale more like this
tabling member printed
David Mundell more like this
uin 165461 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) seeks to recover some or all of the cost of compensation from financial firms that have failed. This benefits both the levy payers that fund the FSCS, and claimants who have been already been paid compensation by the FSCS but still have uncompensated losses. Since the start of the 2015-16 financial year, the FSCS has recovered more than £280mn from failed firms.<p> </p><p>The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Compensation Manual, which sets out the rules regarding the FSCS’s duty to seek recoveries, is published and accessible to consumers on the FCA’s website. The FSCS also publishes information for consumers about its approach to recoveries on its website.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T09:19:31.467Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T09:19:31.467Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
1512
label Biography information for David Mundell more like this
1300867
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Self-employment Income Support Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reasons businesses eligible for the fifth self-employed grant announced in Budget 2021 will be eligible to claim the equivalent of 80 per cent of three months average trading profits capped at £7,500 when the grant period covers five months from May to September; and what plans he has to help meet lost income for the remaining two months. more like this
tabling member constituency Brighton, Pavilion more like this
tabling member printed
Caroline Lucas more like this
uin 165488 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-17more like thismore than 2021-03-17
answer text <p>The Government announced at Budget 2021 that the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) will continue until September, with a fourth and a final fifth grant. The fourth SEISS grant, available to claim from late April, will be worth 80% of average trading profits, paid out in a single instalment covering three months’ worth of annual profits, and capped at £7,500 in total. Further details of the fifth SEISS grant will be published in due course.</p><p> </p><p>Grants are now based on 2019-20  tax returns which is the most up to date information HMRC holds for self-employed individuals. This means that the Government is now in a position to provide support to hundreds of thousands of newly eligible self-employed individuals.</p><p>Using these returns requires time to deliver, due to the increased population and new data. Guidance on how to claim the fourth grant will be available in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The SEISS and the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) are very different schemes. The CJRS pays for hours which are not worked, while SEISS claimants can work while claiming. Furthermore, as the Chancellor announced, employers will be required to contribute to CJRS payments as the economy reopens.  The SEISS is not intended to provide a month-by-month replacement of income. Due to the volatility of self-employed income and the lack of granular data that HMRC hold on self-employed trading profits, precise mapping of income replacement month by month is not possible. Instead, the SEISS provides a lump sum payment to support eligible self-employed individuals whose businesses have been affected by coronavirus.</p><p> </p><p>The SEISS is just one part of a wider package of support for the self-employed. The temporary £20 per week increase to the Universal Credit standard allowance has been extended for six months, and the suspension of the Minimum Income Floor for three months, to the end of July 2021, so that where self-employed claimants' earnings have fallen significantly, their Universal Credit award will have increased to reflect their lower earnings. In addition, they may also have access to other elements of the package, including Restart Grants, the Recovery Loan scheme, business rates relief, and other business support schemes.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 165489 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-17T13:42:45.487Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-17T13:42:45.487Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
3930
label Biography information for Caroline Lucas more like this
1300868
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Self-employment Income Support Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Government is taking to provide financial support for people potentially eligible for the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme (SEISS) prior to being able to make a claim to either the fourth or fifth SEISS grants; and for what reasons that scheme does not deliver parity with the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme with regard to the payment schedule. more like this
tabling member constituency Brighton, Pavilion more like this
tabling member printed
Caroline Lucas more like this
uin 165489 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-17more like thismore than 2021-03-17
answer text <p>The Government announced at Budget 2021 that the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) will continue until September, with a fourth and a final fifth grant. The fourth SEISS grant, available to claim from late April, will be worth 80% of average trading profits, paid out in a single instalment covering three months’ worth of annual profits, and capped at £7,500 in total. Further details of the fifth SEISS grant will be published in due course.</p><p> </p><p>Grants are now based on 2019-20  tax returns which is the most up to date information HMRC holds for self-employed individuals. This means that the Government is now in a position to provide support to hundreds of thousands of newly eligible self-employed individuals.</p><p>Using these returns requires time to deliver, due to the increased population and new data. Guidance on how to claim the fourth grant will be available in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The SEISS and the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) are very different schemes. The CJRS pays for hours which are not worked, while SEISS claimants can work while claiming. Furthermore, as the Chancellor announced, employers will be required to contribute to CJRS payments as the economy reopens.  The SEISS is not intended to provide a month-by-month replacement of income. Due to the volatility of self-employed income and the lack of granular data that HMRC hold on self-employed trading profits, precise mapping of income replacement month by month is not possible. Instead, the SEISS provides a lump sum payment to support eligible self-employed individuals whose businesses have been affected by coronavirus.</p><p> </p><p>The SEISS is just one part of a wider package of support for the self-employed. The temporary £20 per week increase to the Universal Credit standard allowance has been extended for six months, and the suspension of the Minimum Income Floor for three months, to the end of July 2021, so that where self-employed claimants' earnings have fallen significantly, their Universal Credit award will have increased to reflect their lower earnings. In addition, they may also have access to other elements of the package, including Restart Grants, the Recovery Loan scheme, business rates relief, and other business support schemes.</p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 165488 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-17T13:42:45.547Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-17T13:42:45.547Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
3930
label Biography information for Caroline Lucas more like this
1300885
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Freeports: Employment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will publish the estimates that his Department uses for the number of new jobs that will be created in each year to 2025 at each of the freeport locations announced in Budget 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Easington more like this
tabling member printed
Grahame Morris more like this
uin 165497 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-15more like thismore than 2021-03-15
answer text <p>Our focus has been on getting places to send us their bids and proposals, rather than second-guessing what they will do. The modelling we have done to support that process remains sensitive at this point and liable to change significantly now the locations have been announced.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-15T14:48:06.403Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-15T14:48:06.403Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
3973
label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1300937
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-03-09more like thismore than 2021-03-09
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Bradford and Bingley: Investment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the answer of 9 March 2021 of Question 160588 on Bradford & Bingley: Investment, if he will ensure Bradford & Bingley shareholders at the time it was taken into public hands receive a share of the profits that have been generated to the public purse by Bradford & Bingley since it was taken into public ownership. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 165482 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-17more like thismore than 2021-03-17
answer text <p>Following the nationalisation of Bradford &amp; Bingley (B&amp;B) in 2008, the then government made the Bradford &amp; Bingley plc Compensation Scheme Order, which provided that former shareholders should receive compensation in line with their value immediately before the government stepped in.</p><p> </p><p>On 5 July 2010, Peter Clokey published his independent valuation establishing that the shares of B&amp;B had no value at the time of nationalisation, and shareholders would have received nothing had the bank been allowed to fail. No compensation was therefore found to be payable to former shareholders.</p><p> </p><p>This has been tested in the Courts and the government considers the matter closed.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-17T16:26:37.877Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-17T16:26:37.877Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this