Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1144284
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-09-03more like thismore than 2019-09-03
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading World War II: Military Decorations more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, in advance of the 75th anniversary of VE Day, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of extending the Air Crew Europe Star, in line with the Atlantic Star, to ensure that Bomber Command aircrew who have not received either a 1939-45 Star, nor a Bomber Command clasp, get recognition for their sacrifice and service during World War II. more like this
tabling member constituency Thirsk and Malton more like this
tabling member printed
Kevin Hollinrake more like this
uin 286297 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-09-09more like thismore than 2019-09-09
answer text <p>We have enormous admiration and respect for the unique contribution and sacrifice made by Bomber Command aircrew which has been recognised in various ways. Bomber Command aircrew serving after 5 June 1944 (the end date for award of the Air Crew Europe Star) were given recognition for their service in the form of the France and Germany Star.</p><p>Subsequently, in his independent Medals Review in 2012, Sir John Holmes concluded that Bomber Command had been treated inconsistently with those who served in Fighter Command, and his recommendation of the award of the clasp to Bomber Command air crew was to bring this Command into line with Fighter Command veterans who were awarded a Battle of Britain clasp to the 1939-45 Star, thus reflecting the significant contribution both made to defeating the Nazi threat.</p><p>In light of the above, we have no plans to revisit the issue of Medallic recognition for Bomber Command veterans, further to the findings of Sir John Holmes' review. It is a matter for the Advisory Military Sub Committee (AMSC) of the Committee on the Grants of Honours, Decorations and Medals, to whom a case regarding Bomber Command has been submitted, to determine whether they will give the issue further consideration.</p>
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T15:04:41.46Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T15:04:41.46Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4474
label Biography information for Kevin Hollinrake more like this
1144382
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-09-03more like thismore than 2019-09-03
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Saudi Arabia more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) civilian staff in his Department based in the UK, (b) military personnel based in the UK, (c) civilian staff in his Department based in Saudi Arabia and (d) military personnel based in Saudi Arabia were employed by the (i) Saudi Arabian National Guard Communications Project and (ii) Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Project on 1 April 2019. more like this
tabling member constituency North East Fife more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Gethins more like this
uin 286284 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-09-09more like thismore than 2019-09-09
answer text <p>The number of civilian and military personnel based in the UK and Saudi Arabia who were employed by the Saudi Arabian National Guard Communications Project (SANGCOM) and the Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Projects (MODSAP) on 1 April 2019 is shown below. The Saudi Arabian Government reimburses the UK Ministry of Defence for these staff costs and there is, therefore, no cost to the UK taxpayer.</p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Manpower number as at 1 April 2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>SANGCOM</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>MODSAP</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK-based Civilian Staff</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UK-based Military Staff</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Saudi-based Civilian Staff</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>38</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Saudi-based Military Staff</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>66</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T15:13:23.38Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T15:13:23.38Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4434
label Biography information for Stephen Gethins more like this
1144383
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-09-03more like thismore than 2019-09-03
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Saudi Arabia: Military Aid more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) expenditure was for the financial year 2018-19 and (b) budget is for 2019-20 for (i) the Saudi Arabian National Guard Communications Project and (ii) the Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Project. more like this
tabling member constituency North East Fife more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Gethins more like this
uin 286285 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-09-09more like thismore than 2019-09-09
answer text <p>The expenditure of the Saudi Arabian National Guard Communications Project (SANGCOM) is recovered from the Saudi Arabian Government, but SANGCOM operates under a separate Memorandum of Understanding from Ministry of Defence Saudi Armed Forces Project (MODSAP), under which the details of such recoveries are confidential to the two Governments.</p><p>The expenditure by the MODSAP in financial year 2018-19 amounted to £66.43 million. The budget however for financial year 2019-20 is £69.08 million. The costs of MODSAP are met from a management fee received from the Saudi Arabian Government.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T15:09:28.753Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T15:09:28.753Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4434
label Biography information for Stephen Gethins more like this
1144426
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-09-03more like thismore than 2019-09-03
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of establishing a committee of inquiry into the causes and effects of the Afghanistan operation between 2003 and 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
uin 286191 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-09-09more like thismore than 2019-09-09
answer text <p>The Department currently has no plans to conduct an inquiry into the causes and effects of the Afghanistan operation. Following the conclusion of Operation Herrick in 2014, the Army conducted a thorough internal review. We remain focused on supporting the Government of Afghanistan as part of NATO's Resolute Support Mission.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T16:34:39.893Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T16:34:39.893Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4006
label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this
1143358
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-09-02more like thismore than 2019-09-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Royal Fleet Auxiliary more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what is the planned Establishment of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary; and what is its current strength at all Ranks against its Establishment numbers. more like this
tabling member constituency Mid Sussex more like this
tabling member printed
Sir Nicholas Soames more like this
uin 284840 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-09-05more like thismore than 2019-09-05
answer text <p>The table below shows the Royal Fleet Auxiliary's workforce requirement, by rank and rate, as at 1 April 2019.</p><p>I am withholding the strength figures as their disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>RANK</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>REQUIREMENT</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Commodore</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Captain</p></td><td><p>53</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chief Officer</p></td><td><p>87</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>First Officer</p></td><td><p>125</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Second Officer</p></td><td><p>215</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Third Officer</p></td><td><p>145</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chief Petty Officer</p></td><td><p>124</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Petty Officer</p></td><td><p>207</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leading Hand</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Able Bodied Seaman*</p></td><td><p>735</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>1,967</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>*or equivalent</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Note: These figures are from the Royal Fleet Auxiliary's internal system and could differ from published figures.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-09-05T10:53:14.797Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-05T10:53:14.797Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
116
label Biography information for Lord Soames of Fletching more like this