Linked Data API

Filter

These are the filters currently being used to limit the search results. Click on the remove filter icon to remove the filter.

house id	1
max ddp modified	2019-07-17T14:45:45.925Z
answer date	2019-07-18
min answer › question first answered	2019-07-15T15:05:34.967Z
max question first answered	2019-07-22T15:40:08.96Z

Sort by

This list shows the properties that you can sort by. Click on to sort in ascending order and to sort in descending order. The properties that you're currently sorting by are shown at the top of the list. Click on remove this sort to remove a sort and or to reverse the current sort order. Click on the remove all sorting icon to remove all the sorting. Note that sorting can significantly slow down the loading of the page.

View

Choose what information you want to view about each item. There are some pre-defined views, but starred properties are always present no matter what the view. You can star properties by clicking on the icon. The currently starred icons have a icon; clicking on it will unstar the property.

Items per page

Choose how many items to view on each page. The more items you view, the longer the page will take to load.

Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest

date

exactly:

or between:
and

answering body

answering dept id

answering dept short name

answering dept sort name

hansard heading

house id

legislature


pref label

question text

tabling member constituency

tabling member printed

uin

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

exactly:

or between:
and

answer text

answering member constituency

answering member printed

attachment


file name
title

grouped question UIN

question first answered

answering member


label

tabling member


label

1139189

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Treasury

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Treasury

answering dept sort name

Treasury

hansard heading

Motor Vehicles: Excise Duties

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will ring-fence a proportion of the revenue from Vehicle Excise Duty for projects to improve air quality.

tabling member constituency

Greenwich and Woolwich

tabling member printed

Matthew Pennycook

uin

277795

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

19/07/2019

answer text

The Government is committed to tackling air pollution. We have invested over £3.5 billion since 2010 to improve air quality and deliver cleaner transport. From 2020, all funds raised through Vehicle Excise Duty in England will be ring-fenced to form a National Roads Fund, which will be reinvested into the road network. We expect some of this investment to support environmental outcomes across the road network, which includes improving air quality.

answering member constituency

Newark

answering member printed

Robert Jenrick

question first answered

19/07/2019 11:19:49

answering member

4320

label	Biography information for Robert Jenrick

tabling member

4520

label	Biography information for Matthew Pennycook

1139208

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Department for Work and Pensions

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Work and Pensions

answering dept sort name

Work and Pensions

hansard heading

Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis in receipt of disability living allowance in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland, (c) Wales and (d) England appealed a decision at tribunal relating to a reassessment for personal independence payments and had that decision overturned (i) by her Department before the date of that tribunal and (ii) by that tribunal in each year since 2013.

tabling member constituency

East Lothian

tabling member printed

Martin Whitfield

uin

277819

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

The information requested on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) mandatory reconsiderations (MR) and appeals for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Multiple Sclerosis in Scotland, Wales and England can be found in the tables below. The Northern Irish Assembly has devolved responsibility for social security benefits. The responsibility for statistics in Northern Ireland lies with the Department for Communities: <a href="http://www.communities-ni.gov.uk" target="_blank">http://www.communities-ni.gov.uk</a>Since PIP was introduced 4.1m decisions have been made up to March 2019, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned. Reassessments from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to PIP. Table 1: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for reassessment claims to PIP with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, Scotland.<table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>70</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>#</td><td>#</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>370</td><td>70</td><td>20</td><td>60</td><td>50</td><td>#</td><td>10</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>1,360</td><td>210</td><td>60</td><td>150</td><td>100</td><td>10</td><td>20</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>820</td><td>140</td><td>40</td><td>100</td><td>70</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>690</td><td>120</td><td>20</td><td>80</td><td>60</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>20</td></tr></tbody></table> Table 2: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for reassessment claims to PIP with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, Wales. <table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>150</td><td>40</td><td>20</td><td>20</td><td>20</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>250</td><td>60</td><td>10</td><td>50</td><td>30</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>930</td><td>200</td><td>60</td><td>150</td><td>90</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>430</td><td>60</td><td>20</td><td>50</td><td>30</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>240</td><td>50</td><td>10</td><td>20</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table> Table 3: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for reassessment claims to PIP with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, England. <table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>610</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>50</td><td>40</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>2,720</td><td>640</td><td>160</td><td>470</td><td>300</td><td>30</td><td>40</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>9,920</td><td>1,970</td><td>550</td><td>1,400</td><td>840</td><td>80</td><td>140</td><td>560</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>7,160</td><td>1,380</td><td>330</td><td>1,040</td><td>620</td><td>100</td><td>70</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>6,260</td><td>1,220</td><td>300</td><td>810</td><td>500</td><td>120</td><td>10</td><td>80</td></tr></tbody></table>New Claims to PIP. Table 4: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for PIP new claims with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, Scotland. <table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>130</td><td>20</td><td>10</td><td>20</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>#</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>560</td><td>110</td><td>20</td><td>90</td><td>40</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>470</td><td>120</td><td>20</td><td>100</td><td>40</td><td>#</td><td>20</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>540</td><td>130</td><td>20</td><td>110</td><td>50</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>500</td><td>110</td><td>10</td><td>90</td><td>40</td><td>#</td><td>10</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>440</td><td>100</td><td>10</td><td>80</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>10</td></tr></tbody></table> Table 5: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for PIP new claims with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, Wales. <table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>40</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>#</td><td>#</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>250</td><td>40</td><td>10</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>140</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>20</td><td>#</td><td>0</td><td>#</td><td>#</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>180</td><td>40</td><td>#</td><td>40</td><td>20</td><td>#</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>160</td><td>40</td><td>10</td><td>30</td><td>20</td><td>0</td><td>#</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>190</td><td>50</td><td>10</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>#</td><td>#</td><td>#</td></tr></tbody></table> Table 6: The number of Initial Decisions, MRs and appeals for PIP new claims with a main disabling condition of multiple sclerosis, England. <table><tbody><tr><td>Financial Year of Initial Decision</td><td>Number of Initial Decisions</td><td>MRs registered</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was changed</td><td>MRs completed where the initial award was not changed</td><td>Appeals Lodged</td><td>Appeals where the decision was lapsed</td><td>Appeals where the decision was maintained</td><td>Appeals where the decision was overturned in favour of the claimant</td></tr><tr><td>2013/14</td><td>530</td><td>90</td><td>30</td><td>60</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>2014/15</td><td>3,940</td><td>650</td><td>170</td><td>470</td><td>180</td><td>30</td><td>40</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>2015/16</td><td>3,240</td><td>730</td><td>130</td><td>600</td><td>240</td><td>20</td><td>60</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>2016/17</td><td>3,040</td><td>670</td><td>90</td><td>580</td><td>230</td><td>30</td><td>70</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>2017/18</td><td>3,130</td><td>740</td><td>110</td><td>630</td><td>280</td><td>40</td><td>40</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>2018/19</td><td>2,780</td><td>640</td><td>100</td><td>450</td><td>190</td><td>20</td><td>#</td><td>20</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: PIP Computer SystemAll data rounded to the nearest 10. # refers to where there are less than 5 cases. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding. In the application process, claimants’ primary disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer systems. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. The geography relates to the origin of the claim (i.e. derived from claimant’s postcode). PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants. Some decisions which are changed at MR, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at MR and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together. Lapsed appeals are where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal. Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to an MR and appeal.

answering member constituency

North Swindon

answering member printed

Justin Tomlinson

grouped question UIN

276585
276586
277820

question first answered

22/07/2019 14:08:37

answering member

4105

label	Biography information for Justin Tomlinson

tabling member

4626

label	Biography information for Martin Whitfield

1139209

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Department for Work and Pensions

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Work and Pensions

answering dept sort name

Work and Pensions

hansard heading

Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis in (a) Scotland, (b) Northern Ireland, (c) Wales and (d) England who made a new application for personal independence payments appealed the decision made by her Department at tribunal and had that decision overturned by (i) her Department before the date of the tribunal and (ii) the tribunal in each year since 2013.

tabling member constituency

East Lothian

tabling member printed

Martin Whitfield

uin

277820

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

answering member constituency

North Swindon

answering member printed

Justin Tomlinson

grouped question UIN

276585
276586
277819

question first answered

22/07/2019 14:08:37

answering member

4105

label	Biography information for Justin Tomlinson

tabling member

4626

label	Biography information for Martin Whitfield

1139210

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept sort name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

hansard heading

Social Rented Housing: Pets

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Battersea Cats and Dogs Home report on Pet friendly properties, if his Department will issue guidance for local authorities on pets in social housing.

tabling member constituency

Carshalton and Wallington

tabling member printed

Tom Brake

uin

277609

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

18/07/2019

answer text

The circumstances in which pets may be kept is determined locally by landlords, taking account of the views of their tenants. The Department has no plans to issue guidance for local authorities on pets in social housing.

answering member constituency

North West Hampshire

answering member printed

Kit Malthouse

question first answered

18/07/2019 13:02:11

answering member

4495

label	Biography information for Kit Malthouse

tabling member

151

label	Biography information for Tom Brake

1139211

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept sort name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

hansard heading

Social Rented Housing: Pets

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Battersea Cats and Dogs Home report on Pet friendly properties, what assessment his Department has made of the potential benefits of pet ownership for social housing tenants.

tabling member constituency

Carshalton and Wallington

tabling member printed

Tom Brake

uin

277610

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

18/07/2019

answer text

The Department has not made any assessment of the potential benefits of pet ownership for social housing tenants.

answering member constituency

North West Hampshire

answering member printed

Kit Malthouse

question first answered

18/07/2019 13:01:39

answering member

4495

label	Biography information for Kit Malthouse

tabling member

151

label	Biography information for Tom Brake

1139222

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

answering dept id

201

answering dept short name

Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

answering dept sort name

Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

hansard heading

Research: Finance

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what assessment he has made of the equity of the distribution of research and development spending for areas with poor health outcomes.

tabling member constituency

Bolton West

tabling member printed

Chris Green

uin

277765

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (Chi Onwurah MP) on 9 May 2019 to Question <a href="https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2019-04-30/249283/" target="_blank">249283</a>. Further to that answer, on 11 July 2019 the Government announced £135 million of funding to support National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborations (ARCs). The NIHR ARC scheme will support high-quality applied health and care research to make tangible improvements for patients, the public and to health and care services. NIHR ARCs will work with local partners and patients and the public from across the local communities they serve, and particularly with Academic Health Science Networks, to tackle local health and care priorities.

answering member constituency

Kingswood

answering member printed

Chris Skidmore

question first answered

22/07/2019 15:18:24

answering member

4021

label	Biography information for Chris Skidmore

tabling member

4398

label	Biography information for Chris Green

1139223

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

answering dept id

201

answering dept short name

Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

answering dept sort name

Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

hansard heading

Research: Finance

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he plans to take to ensure that the Government's target of increasing research and development funding to 2.4 per cent of GDP benefits the areas with the poorest health outcomes, particularly parts of the north of England.

tabling member constituency

Bolton West

tabling member printed

Chris Green

uin

277766

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

The 2.4% R&D Roadmap will set overall direction for how we can achieve the 2.4% R&D ambition by 2027, and 3% in the longer term, through the use of strategic public funding to leverage private R&D investment.It aims to transform R&D intensity across all sectors of the economy, supporting the development of new technologies, industries, and products that bring growth, good jobs across the UK, and social improvements for all.The 2.4% R&D Roadmap will bring together Government, academia, and industry to collaboratively focus their efforts on increasing R&D investment. In the area of health, this includes the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS R&D activity, and work with industry in taking forward the Life Sciences Sector Deal. The 2.4% R&D Roadmap will also align closely with the Industrial Strategy’s Grand Challenges. This includes the Ageing Society Grand Challenge which will create new demands for technologies, products and services for an ageing population, and the AI and Data Grand Challenge which will use data, artificial intelligence, and innovation to transform the prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and dementia by 2030.In order to achieve the 2.4% R&D target, we need to accelerate the growth and build on R&D strengths across the UK. The Government has put in place a number of initiatives to support every part of the UK to identify and leverage their R&D strengths, from Science and Innovation Audits to the Strength in Places Fund. The Strength in Places Fund (SIPF) is investing £237m up to 2021-22 in growing new and existing centres of excellence for research and innovation across the UK.We are working with Local Economic Partnerships as they develop Local Industrial Strategies to identify science and innovation strengths and the action needed to unlock R&D growth in places across the country.

answering member constituency

Kingswood

answering member printed

Chris Skidmore

question first answered

22/07/2019 15:15:15

answering member

4021

label	Biography information for Chris Skidmore

tabling member

4398

label	Biography information for Chris Green

1139242

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

answering dept sort name

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

hansard heading

Agriculture: Subsidies

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is taking to support the farming and agriculture industry in (a) the UK, (b) Yorkshire and the Humber and (c) Haltemprice and Howden constituency.

tabling member constituency

Haltemprice and Howden

tabling member printed

Mr David Davis

uin

277642

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

Farming has a bright future outside the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. The Great Yorkshire Show demonstrated the strengths that British farming has to offer with a record-breaking number of entries for sheep and cattle, and great produce from Wensleydale cheese to North Yorkshire game. I know very well the importance of supporting these farmers in Yorkshire and Humber, home to my own constituency and farm, as well as my Rt Hon friend’s constituency, Haltemprice and Howden. As we prepare to leave the EU, the UK Government is taking a number of steps to support our farmers and industry in England and across the UK. For the UK as a whole, the Government has pledged to continue to commit the same cash total in funds for farm support until the end of this Parliament, expected in 2022; this includes all funding provided for farm support under both Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 of the current Common Agricultural Policy.The Government has also guaranteed that any projects where funding has been agreed before the end of 2020 will be funded for their full lifetime. This means, in the event the UK leaves the EU with no deal, the UK Government would fund any remaining payments to farmers, land managers and rural businesses due after October 2019. This would ensure continued funding for these projects until they finish. The guarantee also means that Defra and the devolved administrations can continue to sign new projects after the UK leaves the EU during 2019 and 2020. As agriculture is devolved, each administration will have the flexibility to develop agricultural policy suited to their own unique circumstances, once the UK has left the EU. It is for the Scottish, Welsh and future Northern Ireland Governments to decide upon future agricultural policies for their respective nations. For farmers in England, the Agriculture Bill marks a decisive shift in our support. We will create an ambitious new system based on paying “public money for public goods”. Public goods will include improving air and water quality, and habitats for wildlife. By paying for things the public value, we can also improve animal welfare and reduce the use of antibiotics in our food chain. Financial support for innovations like precision farming can help farmers become more productive, reduce the use of expensive chemicals and protect the environment. Critically, our Agriculture Bill also includes a seven year transition period of 2021–2027 for Direct Payments to help farmers in England to plan for the future. In the meantime direct payments for 2019 and 2020 will be made on the same basis as they are now, with simplifications where possible.

answering member constituency

Scarborough and Whitby

answering member printed

Mr Robert Goodwill

question first answered

22/07/2019 12:01:27

answering member

1562

label	Biography information for Sir Robert Goodwill

tabling member

373

label	Biography information for Sir David Davis

1139243

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

answering dept sort name

Housing, Communities and Local Government

hansard heading

Shared Ownership Schemes

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of the shared ownership model for housing development.

tabling member constituency

Haltemprice and Howden

tabling member printed

Mr David Davis

uin

277643

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

Between 2010-11 and 2017-18, around 65,000 new Shared Ownership homes have been delivered.We believe that shared ownership has an important role to play, as part of a diverse and thriving housing market, supporting mixed developments and helping those who aspire to home ownership but may be otherwise unable to afford it. The combination of rent and mortgage will often be lower than the cost of outright purchase and in many areas lower than the cost of private renting.

answering member constituency

North West Hampshire

answering member printed

Kit Malthouse

question first answered

22/07/2019 13:41:48

answering member

4495

label	Biography information for Kit Malthouse

tabling member

373

label	Biography information for Sir David Davis

1139266

registered interest

date

16/07/2019

answering body

Ministry of Justice

answering dept id

answering dept short name

Justice

answering dept sort name

Justice

hansard heading

Prison Service: Industrial Health and Safety

house id

legislature

25259

pref label	House of Commons

question text

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions have prison staff calling the Body Fluid Exposure and Sharps Injury telephone helpline been advised to attend A&E in each month since December 2017.

tabling member constituency

Leeds East

tabling member printed

Richard Burgon

uin

277789

answer

is ministerial correction

date of answer

22/07/2019

answer text

HMPPS has a duty of care to its staff to ensure they are provided immediate and specialist advice following suspected and actual Bodily Fluid Exposure (BFE) incidents. In December 2017 HMPPS put in place a 24 hour Bodily Fluid Exposure and Sharps Injury telephone helpline which provides an initial assessment by a qualified nurse clinician. Number of calls to the Body Fluid Exposure and Sharps Injury telephone helpline per month: (see annex A) Number of times staff have been directed to contact Accident & Emergency:(see annex C)

answering member constituency

South Swindon

answering member printed

Robert Buckland

attachment

1

file name	Copy of Annex A-PQ277787.xlsx
title	Annex A

2

file name	Copy of Annex C- PQ277789.xlsx
title	Annex C

grouped question UIN

277787

question first answered

22/07/2019 15:31:38

answering member

4106

label	Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland

tabling member

4493

label	Biography information for Richard Burgon