Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1136409
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Lead: Theft more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what were the estimated replacement costs for lead stolen from churches in England in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alderdice more like this
uin HL16859 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-12more like thismore than 2019-07-12
answer text <p>The Government are not party to information on the replacement costs for lead stolen from churches in England, as this is the responsibility of local congregations. We have not had discussions with Historic England regarding the replacement of lead stolen from church roofs, nor the use of alternative materials in their replacement.</p><p> </p><p>Government currently provides support to churches throughout the UK via the Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme which is presently funded to a maximum of £42m per annum. Established in 2001, the scheme provides grants towards VAT paid on repairs, maintenance and alterations to listed buildings that are used principally as places of worship.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
grouped question UIN HL16862 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-12T11:06:55.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-12T11:06:55.827Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
3478
label Biography information for Lord Alderdice more like this
1136410
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Lead: Theft more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many convictions for theft of lead from churches in England have been recorded in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alderdice more like this
uin HL16860 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
answer text <p>To identify whether theft convictions were specifically related to theft of lead from churches in England would require manual searching of court records, which would be of disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T13:26:09.91Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T13:26:09.91Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
3478
label Biography information for Lord Alderdice more like this
1136412
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Lead: Theft more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with English Heritage about the replacement of lead stolen from church roofs; and whether they raised in any such discussions the option to replace such lead with materials of a similar appearance but less value. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alderdice more like this
uin HL16862 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-12more like thismore than 2019-07-12
answer text <p>The Government are not party to information on the replacement costs for lead stolen from churches in England, as this is the responsibility of local congregations. We have not had discussions with Historic England regarding the replacement of lead stolen from church roofs, nor the use of alternative materials in their replacement.</p><p> </p><p>Government currently provides support to churches throughout the UK via the Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme which is presently funded to a maximum of £42m per annum. Established in 2001, the scheme provides grants towards VAT paid on repairs, maintenance and alterations to listed buildings that are used principally as places of worship.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
grouped question UIN HL16859 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-12T11:06:55.877Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-12T11:06:55.877Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
3478
label Biography information for Lord Alderdice more like this
1136414
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Arts more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the needs and requirements of (1) authors, and (2) the creative industries, in regard to the UK's future relationship with the EU. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Balfe more like this
uin HL16864 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-12more like thismore than 2019-07-12
answer text <p>The UK publishing industry is world leading, using the written word to educate, entertain and inform. Leaving the EU will not change that. In 2016, the publishing industry exported over £2.5 billion in goods and over £2.3 billion in services.</p><p> </p><p>DCMS is working closely with industry and others across Government to ensure that the creative industries benefit from the UK’s future trade agreements, including our future economic partnership with the European Union. We have also proposed a wide-reaching agreement on culture which will facilitate cooperation between the UK and the EU. We will continue to deepen this engagement over the coming months.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-12T10:42:07.247Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-12T10:42:07.247Z
answering member
4247
label Biography information for Lord Ashton of Hyde more like this
tabling member
4302
label Biography information for Lord Balfe more like this
1136415
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Vitamins more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of (1) the safety, and (2) the effectiveness, of using IV vitamin drips and other related therapies offered by retail clinics. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Birt more like this
uin HL16865 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
answer text <p>If retail clinics are intending to administer vitamin drips and other related therapies intravenously for a medicinal purpose then the products and associated advertising must be in compliance with all relevant aspects of medicines legislation which includes an assessment of the safety quality and efficacy for licensed medicines.</p><p>The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is the United Kingdom body responsible for ensuring that medicines work and are acceptably safe.</p><p>Intravenous drips which are not intended for a medical purpose are not medicines and these products fall outside the MHRA’s jurisdiction.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T15:27:10.663Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:27:10.663Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
tabling member
2533
label Biography information for Lord Birt more like this
1136416
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept id 16 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
hansard heading Syria: Chemical Weapons more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report by the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda, and Media How the OPCW's investigation of the Douma incident was nobbled, published on 26 June. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Cox more like this
uin HL16866 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
answer text <p>​The UK has full confidence in the expertise and methodology of the Organization for the Prohibition or Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Fact Finding Mission (FFM). The OPCW Director General has confirmed that all evidence and views were considered by the FFM in reaching its conclusion on the incident in Douma on 7 April 2018. The final FFM report of 1 March 2019 concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe a chemical weapons attack took place.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T15:10:16.597Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:10:16.597Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
3364
label Biography information for Baroness Cox more like this
1136420
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department for International Trade more like this
answering dept id 202 more like this
answering dept short name International Trade more like this
answering dept sort name International Trade more like this
hansard heading EU External Trade: Mercosur more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the benefits of the EU–Mercosur trade agreement; and which commercial sectors in the UK are expected to benefit from this agreement. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Crawley more like this
uin HL16870 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answer text <p>The EU-Mercosur trade agreement reached political conclusion on 28 June 2019. This means that we have yet to receive the final text, which would be needed to assess the impacts of the final negotiated outcome, including which commercial sectors would benefit. This text is unlikely to be available for some time since the EU and Mercosur are still finalising the details of the agreement, which will then need to undergo legal review and official translation.</p><p>We welcome the news of political conclusion between the EU and Mercosur on a Free Trade Agreement. As a global champion of trade, the UK has been a strong advocate for these negotiations. The UK has longstanding positive bilateral relationships with individual Mercosur countries and we look forward to deepening our trading ties as we leave the EU. We will be working with our Mercosur partners to develop our future trade relationship in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
grouped question UIN HL16871 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-08T16:22:47.843Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T16:22:47.843Z
answering member
4169
label Biography information for Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
tabling member
3386
label Biography information for Baroness Crawley more like this
1136421
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department for International Trade more like this
answering dept id 202 more like this
answering dept short name International Trade more like this
answering dept sort name International Trade more like this
hansard heading Trade Agreements: Mercosur more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to seek a trade agreement along similar lines to the EU–Mercosur trade agreement once the UK has departed the EU; if so, whether they have begun any such discussions with Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay; and when they expect any such negotiations to be concluded. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Crawley more like this
uin HL16871 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answer text <p>The EU-Mercosur trade agreement reached political conclusion on 28 June 2019. This means that we have yet to receive the final text, which would be needed to assess the impacts of the final negotiated outcome, including which commercial sectors would benefit. This text is unlikely to be available for some time since the EU and Mercosur are still finalising the details of the agreement, which will then need to undergo legal review and official translation.</p><p>We welcome the news of political conclusion between the EU and Mercosur on a Free Trade Agreement. As a global champion of trade, the UK has been a strong advocate for these negotiations. The UK has longstanding positive bilateral relationships with individual Mercosur countries and we look forward to deepening our trading ties as we leave the EU. We will be working with our Mercosur partners to develop our future trade relationship in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
grouped question UIN HL16870 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-08T16:22:47.907Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-08T16:22:47.907Z
answering member
4169
label Biography information for Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
tabling member
3386
label Biography information for Baroness Crawley more like this
1136423
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Cannabis: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to extend the availability of medicinal cannabis to people with diseases that cause chronic pain. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
uin HL16873 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
answer text <p>The law was changed on 1 November 2018 to allow clinicians on the General Medical Council’s Specialist Register to prescribe cannabis-based products for medicinal use (CBPM), where it is clinically appropriate and in the best interest of patients. Whilst the law allows clinicians to prescribe these products for the management of chronic pain, interim guidance jointly produced by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Radiologists, in liaison with the Faculty of Pain Medicine of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, concludes that there is not yet robust evidence for the use of CBPM in chronic pain, and their use is currently not recommended.</p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has been commissioned to develop updated clinical guidance on the prescribing of CBPM, including for the management of chronic pain, which will be published by October 2019. It will be based on the best available international evidence and will have been produced using NICE’s world-renowned process for identifying and assessing relevant studies and delivering such guidance. NICE is expected to consult on the draft guidance between 23 July – 20 August 2019.</p><p>An initial impact assessment <em>Rescheduling of cannabis-based products for medicinal use under the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 </em>was published alongside The Misuse of Drugs (Amendments) (Cannabis and Licence Fees) (England, Wales and Scotland) Regulations 2018. A copy of this impact assessment is attached. This set out the approach that the Government proposed to take in assessing the costs and benefits of the change in the law at a population level, with regard to the rescheduling of CBPM. This framework included an analysis of cost and benefits for the use of cannabis for the management of chronic pain.</p><p>To further the evidence-base, the National Institute for Health Research has issued two calls for research in this area, and is working with the industry and researchers to ensure that the evidence is developed in a way that will inform decisions on public funding. This research will be open to all good quality proposals covering any indication, including multiple sclerosis, pain and other disorders unresponsive to existing treatments.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
grouped question UIN
HL16874 more like this
HL16875 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T15:30:08.963Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:30:08.963Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
attachment
1
file name Impact_Assessment.pdf more like this
title Impact_Assessment more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
1136424
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Cannabis: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of (1) the advantages, and (2) the disadvantages, of allowing medical professionals to prescribe medicinal cannabis to people suffering from chronic pain. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this
uin HL16874 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
answer text <p>The law was changed on 1 November 2018 to allow clinicians on the General Medical Council’s Specialist Register to prescribe cannabis-based products for medicinal use (CBPM), where it is clinically appropriate and in the best interest of patients. Whilst the law allows clinicians to prescribe these products for the management of chronic pain, interim guidance jointly produced by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Radiologists, in liaison with the Faculty of Pain Medicine of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, concludes that there is not yet robust evidence for the use of CBPM in chronic pain, and their use is currently not recommended.</p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has been commissioned to develop updated clinical guidance on the prescribing of CBPM, including for the management of chronic pain, which will be published by October 2019. It will be based on the best available international evidence and will have been produced using NICE’s world-renowned process for identifying and assessing relevant studies and delivering such guidance. NICE is expected to consult on the draft guidance between 23 July – 20 August 2019.</p><p>An initial impact assessment <em>Rescheduling of cannabis-based products for medicinal use under the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 </em>was published alongside The Misuse of Drugs (Amendments) (Cannabis and Licence Fees) (England, Wales and Scotland) Regulations 2018. A copy of this impact assessment is attached. This set out the approach that the Government proposed to take in assessing the costs and benefits of the change in the law at a population level, with regard to the rescheduling of CBPM. This framework included an analysis of cost and benefits for the use of cannabis for the management of chronic pain.</p><p>To further the evidence-base, the National Institute for Health Research has issued two calls for research in this area, and is working with the industry and researchers to ensure that the evidence is developed in a way that will inform decisions on public funding. This research will be open to all good quality proposals covering any indication, including multiple sclerosis, pain and other disorders unresponsive to existing treatments.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
grouped question UIN
HL16873 more like this
HL16875 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T15:30:09.023Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:30:09.023Z
answering member
4019
label Biography information for Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford more like this
attachment
1
file name Impact_Assessment.pdf more like this
title Impact_Assessment more like this
tabling member
248
label Biography information for Lord Jones of Cheltenham more like this