Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1128806
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading National Probation Service for England and Wales: Greater London more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment he has made of whether the National Probation Service has adequate resources to undertake work effectively in the London Division. more like this
tabling member constituency Lewisham West and Penge more like this
tabling member printed
Ellie Reeves more like this
uin 259398 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>As I said in my previous response to PQ 257583, the National Probation Service (NPS) is currently recruiting more staff into the organisation. We have seen an increase in both the volume and diversity of probation officer applicants following a change in the recruitment process and eligibility criteria. A national campaign to recruit probation officers took place recently and successful candidates will start in July 2019.</p><p> </p><p>NPS London have prioritised the recruitment of Probation Officers to fill all current and projected vacancies and have had 211 new staff joining over the past year. As of March 2019, approximately 1,325 full time equivalent staff are employed; a net increase of 57 from March 2018. They have also introduced new victim-specific training for staff.</p><p> </p><p>NPS London are closely monitoring the caseload capacity for staff and would take proportionate and appropriate action to manage workloads across the division.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
grouped question UIN 259472 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T14:28:18.863Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T14:28:18.863Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
4620
label Biography information for Ellie Reeves more like this
1128811
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Working Links more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 21 May 2019 to Question 254799, on Working Links, for what reasons Working Links Ministry of Justice Permitted Subcontractors are receiving payments and protections but Working Links Permitted Subcontractors for her Department are not. more like this
tabling member constituency Easington more like this
tabling member printed
Grahame Morris more like this
uin 259183 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>The Department refers to the responses to 2 previous PQs (254799 and 257591) which addressed this question on 17<sup>th</sup> May and 28<sup>th</sup> May respectively. This answer confirms those responses.</p><p> </p><p>The MOJ are making payments to a small number of Permitted Sub Contractors on the basis of a) the unique nature of their services (statutory services) and b) the structure of their current market in the context of the transformation announced on 16<sup>th</sup> May 2019.</p><p>There is no defined term within DWP contracts for Permitted Subcontractors.</p><p> </p><p>The Department considered the impact on stakeholders and sub-contractors, based on the Administrator’s statement of affairs at the point of Working Links going into administration, and has worked with both the Administrator and Fedcap, who have taken over a number of Working Links contracts, to minimise the impact on those supply chain partners owed monies by Working Links at the point of administration.</p><p> </p><p>The Department has met all of its obligations in regard to the contracts, including payments, leading up to and as a consequence of the administration.</p>
answering member constituency Colchester more like this
answering member printed Will Quince more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T16:46:42.813Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T16:46:42.813Z
answering member
4423
label Biography information for Will Quince more like this
tabling member
3973
label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1128812
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Sickle Cell Diseases: Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of potential levels of inequality in (a) the life expectancy and (b) NHS service provision for patients with sickle cell disease compared to other NHS patients. more like this
tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
tabling member printed
Diana Johnson more like this
uin 259466 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>Evidence suggests that life expectancy for people with sickle cell disease is improving. This is due to a number of factors including:</p><p>- Improved newborn screening coverage to enable earlier diagnosis;</p><p>- Use of the National Haemoglobinopathy Registry to monitor individuals’ health, treatment and their annual reviews;</p><p>- Access to specific diagnostics and medication, such as hydroxyurea; and</p><p>- A Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) incentive has been in place for the last two years to improve access to apheresis for individuals with sickle cell disease.</p><p>All these factors are reflected in the service specification quality indicators which providers are required to report against so that implementation can be monitored.</p><p>It is anticipated that NHS England’s new model for specialised haemoglobinopathy services will be in place by early 2020. The new model is designed to improve access to specialist advice and care for patients, irrespective of where they live. The equality impact assessment on the new service model indicates that it will advance the promotion of equality and support the further reduction of health inequalities. This will be through ensuring that patients with thalassemia and sickle cell conditions have equitable access to high quality specialist care and support within specialised commissioned centres irrespective of where in the country they live. These centres will promote best practice in service delivery.</p>
answering member constituency South Ribble more like this
answering member printed Seema Kennedy more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T13:13:01.52Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T13:13:01.52Z
answering member
4455
label Biography information for Seema Kennedy more like this
tabling member
1533
label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this
1128818
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Muslim Brotherhood more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will proscribe the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 259080 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>Whilst we keep the list of proscribed groups under review, we do not routinely comment on whether an organisation is or is not under consideration for proscription.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North more like this
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T15:32:54.72Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T15:32:54.72Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1128820
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Islamic Resistance Support Organization more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Islamic Resistance Support Organisation operates in the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Enfield North more like this
tabling member printed
Joan Ryan more like this
uin 258942 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-18more like thismore than 2019-06-18
answer text <p>The Home Office does not keep a central register of all the organisations that operate in the UK.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North more like this
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-18T16:12:11.337Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-18T16:12:11.337Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
166
label Biography information for Joan Ryan more like this
1128821
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading High Rise Flats: Insulation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 9 May 2019 to Question 249217 on High Rise Flats: Insulation, how much of that £259 million has been allocated to (a) housing associations and (b) other registered providers; and whether he holds information on the amount allocated to registered providers by the local authority where their blocks are located. more like this
tabling member constituency Croydon Central more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Jones more like this
uin 259401 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>Of the £259 million that has been allocated, £123 million has been allocated to housing associations and £136.4 million has been allocated to local authorities.</p><p>The table below shows total approved costs by building location. Due to public safety considerations, five local authority areas have not been specifically named as this could lead to the disclosure of individual buildings.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Local authority area</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Approved Funding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>£0.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>£6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>£21.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calderdale</p></td><td><p>£1.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>£0.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>£80.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>£10m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Havering</p></td><td><p>£0.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>£5.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>£20.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>£7.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>£3.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>£1.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>£11.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>£1.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reading</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p>£10.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sandwell</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sefton</p></td><td><p>£2.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sheffield</p></td><td><p>£3.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southwark</p></td><td><p>£8.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stockton on Tees</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sunderland</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p>£12.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Trafford</p></td><td><p>£4.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>£16.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>£6.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other (5 Local Authority Areas)</p></td><td><p>£11.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£259.4m</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T15:30:35.667Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T15:30:35.667Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
4631
label Biography information for Sarah Jones more like this
1128825
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading High Rise Flats: Insulation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what estimate he made of the (a) number of blocks, (b) cost per block and 9c) cost per dwelling when calculating the £200 million private sector cladding remediation fund. more like this
tabling member constituency Croydon Central more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Jones more like this
uin 259402 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>The Government has announced its commitment to fully fund the remediation of private sector high-rise residential blocks with unsafe Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding, except where a warranty claim is accepted. The fund will cover reasonable costs associated with the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM cladding systems on all eligible buildings and the estimated cost is £200 million. A number of building owners and developers including Taylor Wimpey, Legal &amp; General, Mace Group, Lendlease, Barratt Developments and Aberdeen Standard Investments have agreed to maintain their commitment to fund remediation and will not draw on the fund.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T07:44:45.51Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T07:44:45.51Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
4631
label Biography information for Sarah Jones more like this
1128826
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading High Rise Flats: Insulation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, which housing associations have been allocated funding as part of the £400 million cladding remediation fund for social sector blocks; and how much each such association has been allocated. more like this
tabling member constituency Croydon Central more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Jones more like this
uin 259403 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>To date, MHCLG has approved £123 million of funding to 33 housing association building owners.</p><p>The table below shows total approved costs to housing associations. Due to public safety considerations, 14 housing associations have not been specifically named as this could lead to the disclosure of individual buildings.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Housing Association</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Approved Funding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clarion Housing Group</p></td><td><p>£0.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hyde Housing Association</p></td><td><p>£3.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Origin Housing</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poplar HARCA</p></td><td><p>£0.3m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tower Hamlets Community Housing</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Catalyst Housing Limited</p></td><td><p>£8.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Network Homes</p></td><td><p>£17.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>One Housing Group</p></td><td><p>£2.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>One Vision Housing</p></td><td><p>£2.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Optivo</p></td><td><p>£0.3m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thirteen Group</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Together Housing</p></td><td><p>£1.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gentoo Group</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London and Quadrant Housing Trust</p></td><td><p>£1.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newlon Housing Trust</p></td><td><p>£7.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Notting Hill Genesis</p></td><td><p>£4.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Peabody</p></td><td><p>£1.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salix Homes</p></td><td><p>£8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other (14 HAs)</p></td><td><p>£45.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£123m</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T15:31:11.733Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T15:31:11.733Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
4631
label Biography information for Sarah Jones more like this
1128828
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrant Workers: Dentistry more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Government plans to exclude (a) dentists and (b) dental nurses from the cap on Tier 2 visas. more like this
tabling member constituency Canterbury more like this
tabling member printed
Rosie Duffield more like this
uin 259393 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>On 6 July 2018, an Immigration Rules change to the Tier 2 (General) cap came into effect, to address particular pressures facing the NHS.</p><p>This change exempted doctors and nurses from the cap and freed up more spaces for other sponsored high-skilled occupations, including dentists. Since this exemption, no dentist has been refused a Tier 2 (General) place and the cap has not been breached. There are no current plans to make further changes to the operation of the Tier 2 cap within the current immigration system.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Romsey and Southampton North more like this
answering member printed Caroline Nokes more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T15:27:14.257Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T15:27:14.257Z
answering member
4048
label Biography information for Caroline Nokes more like this
tabling member
4616
label Biography information for Rosie Duffield more like this
1128834
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-03more like thismore than 2019-06-03
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Apprentices: Free School Meals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what proportion of apprenticeship starters were eligible for free school meals in (a) Ashfield constituency, (b) Nottinghamshire and (c) England in each quarter of each academic year since 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Ashfield more like this
tabling member printed
Gloria De Piero more like this
uin 259156 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-06more like thismore than 2019-06-06
answer text <p>Information on the proportion of apprenticeship starters who were eligible for free school meals is not held in the format requested.</p><p> </p><p>We publish data on apprenticeship starts with various breakdowns by level, local authority and parliamentary constituency in the apprenticeships geography and sector subject area tool of the apprenticeships data library. This can be found at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/fe-data-library-apprenticeships" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/fe-data-library-apprenticeships</a>.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Guildford more like this
answering member printed Anne Milton more like this
grouped question UIN 259158 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-06T16:40:26.673Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-06T16:40:26.673Z
answering member
1523
label Biography information for Anne Milton more like this
tabling member
3915
label Biography information for Gloria De Piero more like this