Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

890042
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-23more like thismore than 2018-04-23
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Salvation Army: Contracts more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether regular safeguarding inspections of sub-contractors are carried out by the Salvation Army in its capacity as the Government’s modern slavery victim care contract manager. more like this
tabling member constituency Nottingham North more like this
tabling member printed
Alex Norris more like this
uin 137094 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>The Salvation Army (TSA) are contracted by the Home Office to deliver the Victim Care Contract, which ensures that the needs of adult potential victims of modern slavery are met. This includes accommodation, medical care, counselling, translation services and a dedicated specialist support worker. TSA are required to adhere to the Home Office’s own requirements in respect of safeguarding.</p><p>TSA subcontracts to a network of 13 subcontractors in England and Wales to deliver this service. Within the contract, there are requirements for subcontractors to be inspected on a regular basis; these are inspections on both accommodation standards and safeguarding, which are carried out annually.</p><p>The Salvation Army undertakes routine safeguarding checks of all subcontracted provision – undertaken by their independent inspection team. The Key Performance Indicators show that these inspections consistently prove satisfactory across all subcontractors.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T14:48:23.293Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T14:48:23.293Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
4641
label Biography information for Alex Norris more like this
884169
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Crimes against Humanity: Prosecutions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many times the Crown Prosecution Service has used (1) the International Criminal Court Act 2001, and (2) the Coroner’s and Justice Act 2009, on the basis of universal jurisdiction; what were those cases; and what were the offences the individuals were charged and convicted for. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6854 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service has to date not prosecuted any individual on the basis of universal jurisdiction for offences contrary to the International Criminal Court Act 2001 and the Coroner’s and Justice Act 2009.</p><p>There have been a small number of prosecutions for international crimes by the CPS, including those of Anthony Sawonuik who was convicted of war crimes from World War II and Faryadi Sarwar Zardad who was convicted of torture and hostage taking as a result of offences committed in Afghanistan.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:08:17.617Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:08:17.617Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
884170
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Genocide: Prosecutions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many times the Crown Prosecution Service has charged individuals with the crime of genocide; and how many convictions were ultimately secured. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6855 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>The Crown Prosecution Service has to date not charged any individual with the crime of genocide.</p><p>There have been a small number of prosecutions for international crimes by the CPS, including those of Anthony Sawonuik who was convicted of war crimes from World War II and Faryadi Sarwar Zardad who was convicted of torture and hostage taking as a result of offences committed in Afghanistan.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:08:39.053Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:08:39.053Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
884172
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Genocide: Prosecutions more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, in cases blocked by the UK Courts’ extradition of alleged genocidaires to the countries requesting their extradition in order to prosecute them there, whether there has been any consideration of prosecuting those alleged genocidaires in the UK on charges of genocide under the principle of universal jurisdiction; if so, what were the challenges; and what has been done to overcome them. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6857 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Before a prosecution can take place, there has to be a police investigation. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has no powers to investigate allegations of crime. The war crimes team of the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command (SO15) is responsible for the investigation of all allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and torture. They decide whether an investigation is required and how it should be conducted. SO15 received a request from Rwandan authorities in January 2018 to investigate five individuals in the UK in relation to alleged genocide offences in Rwanda dating from around 1994. SO15 has not launched an investigation as it is currently assessing material provided from Rwandan authorities to determine whether it will be possible to carry out further scoping of the allegations.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:18:26.573Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:18:26.573Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
884173
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept id 16 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
hansard heading Nigeria: Violence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential for further Islamist violence in Nigeria following reports of unprovoked attacks on Christian communities in the north of that country, including the murder of two Catholic men on 5 April. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6858 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>We are concerned by the deaths of two men on 5 April in Kaduna State. The facts of this and all other incidents should be established and perpetrators brought to justice. The UK calls on all parties to find a peaceful solution to the complex underlying causes of these incidents to reduce the potential for further violence.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T15:48:11.4Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T15:48:11.4Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
884176
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they have taken to reduce the number of days added to the sentences of prisoners for misconduct. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL6861 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6862 more like this
HL6863 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.743Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.743Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884177
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners had their sentences extended for misconduct in each year from 2011 to 2016. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL6862 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6861 more like this
HL6863 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.867Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.867Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884178
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the cause of the increase in the number of days added to the sentences of prisoners for misconduct between 2011 and 2016. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham more like this
uin HL6863 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6861 more like this
HL6862 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.977Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.977Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884181
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Eurostar: Immigration Controls more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 29 March (HL Deb, col 900) that “assessment is made of the throughput of traffic and gates are opened and closed accordingly”, why no biometric gates were open at the St Pancras Eurostar terminal on 30 March at a time of maximum traffic; and whether they intend to review their assessment procedure to avoid a recurrence of delays. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6866 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-24more like thismore than 2018-04-24
answer text <p>The biometric gates at St Pancras Eurostar terminal are owned by Eurostar and operated by French Police aux frontieres. They are part of the French border control process and they dictate the hours of operation.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Eurostar Gare du Nord to St Pancras route has a juxtaposed control in place and the UK Border checks are carried out at Gare du Nord. I can confirm the UK biometric gates were open between 0500-1900 on the 30 March 2018.<strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-24T11:38:09.09Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-24T11:38:09.09Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this
884182
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Duchy of Cornwall: VAT more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Duchy of Cornwall is subject to rules relating to Value Added Tax (VAT) on the same basis as other bodies; if so, whether the Duchy is registered for VAT; and how much VAT was charged by the Duchy in each of the last two financial years. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL6867 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>The Duchy of Cornwall is subject to VAT on the same basis as other bodies.</p><p> </p><p>In response to the second and third parts of the question, HM Revenue and Customs ensures that everyone pays the tax they owe under the law. They cannot comment on the detailed affairs of individual taxpayers.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T11:42:27.867Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T11:42:27.867Z
answering member
1091
label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this