Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

806329
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Refugees: English Language more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress has been made in improving English language provision for refugees since the meeting between Home Office Ministers and Lord Alton of Liverpool on 21 November; and whether they have any plans to provide more fast track English language training to enable Syrian refugees, and other suitably qualified doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals, who are refugees, to take up work in the NHS. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL4127 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>As soon as adults are granted refugee status or humanitarian protection they become eligible for skills funding (including for ESOL courses) through the adult education budget.</p><p><br>The Home Office also provides funding for English language as part of its commitment to resettling vulnerable people through the Vulnerable Persons Relocation Scheme to the UK. This funding includes a tariff for each person resettled, a proportion of which can be allocated to ESOL provision. For those resettled under these programmes, local authorities are now required to provide a minimum of eight hours’ formal tuition a week, within a month of arrival, and for a period of at least 12 months, or until the individual reaches at least English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) entry level three (whichever is the sooner).</p><p><br>All NHS professions (including all doctors and nurses) have an English language requirement of IELTS 7. This is not a Home Office requirement but a requirement set by their regulatory bodies (for example General Medical Council). ESOL courses are available for free to those in receipt of jobseeker’s allowance.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
grouped question UIN HL4128 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T15:37:08.717Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T15:37:08.717Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
806330
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Refugees: English Language more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to change rules that impact the ability of refugees who are health professionals to access full time English language lessons while being in receipt of jobseeker's allowance. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL4128 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>As soon as adults are granted refugee status or humanitarian protection they become eligible for skills funding (including for ESOL courses) through the adult education budget.</p><p><br>The Home Office also provides funding for English language as part of its commitment to resettling vulnerable people through the Vulnerable Persons Relocation Scheme to the UK. This funding includes a tariff for each person resettled, a proportion of which can be allocated to ESOL provision. For those resettled under these programmes, local authorities are now required to provide a minimum of eight hours’ formal tuition a week, within a month of arrival, and for a period of at least 12 months, or until the individual reaches at least English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) entry level three (whichever is the sooner).</p><p><br>All NHS professions (including all doctors and nurses) have an English language requirement of IELTS 7. This is not a Home Office requirement but a requirement set by their regulatory bodies (for example General Medical Council). ESOL courses are available for free to those in receipt of jobseeker’s allowance.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
grouped question UIN HL4127 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T15:37:08.873Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T15:37:08.873Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
806331
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Great Western Main Line: Electrification more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the out-turn cost, in cost per single track kilometre, for completing the electrification of the Great Western Main Line. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL4129 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>In the National Audit Office report earlier this year, the total estimated cost of the Great Western Route Modernisation infrastructure programme was £5.58billion.</p><p>The Department for Transport does not hold information on the cost of per single track kilometre.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:09:38.263Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:09:38.263Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
806332
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Midland Main Line: Electrification more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the projected cost, in cost per single track kilometre, for electrification of the Midland Main Line railway from Bedford to Corby. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL4130 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>We are investing over £1 billion in the biggest upgrade of the Midland Main Line since it was completed in 1870. The specific costs of each element of the upgrade are commercially sensitive and cannot be released currently as this may prejudice future commercial arrangements by the Department for Transport and Network Rail.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:10:00.553Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:10:00.553Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
806333
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Trains: Standards more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment, if any, they have made of the difference in availability for service of bi-mode and electric Intercity Express Programme trains. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL4131 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>When procuring the Intercity Express Programme (IEP) trains, the Department for Transport specified the number of train diagrams required rather than the total number of trains. It was for bidders to decide how many trains were needed to deliver those contracted diagrams, whether electric or bi-mode, based on assumptions for the split of diesel and electric mileages. When making those assessments bidders will have taken into account both the different maintenance needs for electric and bi-mode trains as well as the increased flexibility of having bi-mode trains that are able to fulfil an electric diagram (in the absence of an electric train) but potentially not the other way around.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:10:55.287Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:10:55.287Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
806334
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Midland Main Line: Rolling Stock more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have made any assessment of the estimated additional track wear maintenance costs that might occur on the Midland Main Line as a result of the use of bi-mode Intercity Express Programme trains rather than electric trains. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL4132 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>It would not have been possible to run electric trains to Sheffield until at least the start of 2024 when the infrastructure might have been delivered. The value for money for this work, taking account of the impact of HS2, was poor which is why this work is not being pursued and other upgrades are being delivered along this route that will deliver the same passenger benefits more quickly.</p><p> </p><p>Variable Track Access Charge (VTAC) rates are paid by Train Operating Companies to Network Rail for use of its infrastructure. The purpose of this charge is to allow Network Rail to recover its operating, maintenance and renewal costs that vary with traffic (including track wear and tear). No new trains have yet been ordered for the Midland Mainline and this would be subject to competition and future design, so therefore precise information on the VTAC rates for the new bi-mode rolling stock are not yet available.</p><p> </p><p>Analysis on the Midland Main Line programme conducted earlier this year assumed VTAC rates for electric trains would be around 1/5th lower than that for bi-modes. The design of new rolling stock can be optimised to minimise track wear. However, in practice the design and specification of new trains is based on a wide range of often conflicting considerations that need to be balanced to achieve the best solution in the round. Track wear is only one of these considerations and it would be misleading to base design choices on track wear alone.</p><p> </p><p>Track access charges are only one part of rail industry costs and we make decisions looking at all factors and costs and benefits in the round.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:12:13.723Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:12:13.723Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
806335
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Trains: Standards more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have made any assessment of differing levels of performance and reliability between bi-mode Intercity Express Programme trains and electric trains when in traffic. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradshaw more like this
uin HL4133 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>The Intercity Express Programme agreements embody reliability targets that are designed to produce a step change in performance for the benefit of passengers and to create value to the taxpayer for the next 27.5 years. Those reliability targets were built up using different assumptions for diesel and electric operations, the precise levels of which remain commercially confidential, and will have a direct impact on the payments made to Agility Trains. Once the full fleet is in service and current electrification programme is complete, the payments made to Agility Trains and deductions for poor performance will make no distinction over whether in diesel or electric operation.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Sugg more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:13:05.973Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:13:05.973Z
answering member
4584
label Biography information for Baroness Sugg more like this
tabling member
2483
label Biography information for Lord Bradshaw more like this
806336
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading NHS: Employment Agencies more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O'Shaughnessy on 27 November (HL3070), whether each of the three NHS-approved framework operators for the provision of agency staff to the NHS is publicly owned. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Clark of Windermere more like this
uin HL4134 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-21more like thismore than 2017-12-21
answer text <p>NHS Improvement has approved three framework operators for the supply of agency staff within the National Health Service, these are: Crown Commercial Services, the NHS Collaborative Procurement Partnership and Health Trust Europe.</p><p> </p><p>We can confirm that Crown Commercial Services and the NHS Collaborative Procurement Partnership are both publicly owned.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS Collaborative Procurement Partnership is the culmination of the collaborative working of four NHS procurement organisations; NHS Commercial Solutions, East of England NHS Collaborative Procurement Hub, NHS North of England Commercial Procurement Collaborative, and NHS London Procurement Partnership.</p><p> </p><p>We can confirm that Health Trust Europe is owned by Health Care America and is a privately owned company. In line with legal requirements they are hosted by University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and are fully compliant with all legal obligations required to supply within the NHS.</p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-21T13:18:09.387Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-21T13:18:09.387Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
525
label Biography information for Lord Clark of Windermere more like this
806337
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Dental Services: Negligence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the main causes of clinical negligence in NHS dental care in England. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Colwyn more like this
uin HL4135 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>No such assessment has been made as the Department does not hold data on the causes of clinical negligence in National Health Service dental care.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T13:37:32.417Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T13:37:32.417Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
3394
label Biography information for Lord Colwyn more like this
806338
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-12-13more like thismore than 2017-12-13
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Dental Services: Negligence more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what engagement they have had with dental stakeholders regarding the cost of professional indemnity insurance in relation to clinical negligence. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Colwyn more like this
uin HL4136 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-12-20more like thismore than 2017-12-20
answer text <p>Departmental Ministers and officials regularly meet with dental stakeholders to discuss expenses and other matters. Most recently, the Parliamentary under Secretary of State (Steve Brine MP) met with the British Dental Association (BDA), as the main representative body for the dental profession, on 28 November 2017 to discuss a range of issues, including professional indemnity insurance. Departmental officials also met with the BDA on 22 November 2017 to discuss professional indemnity insurance.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-12-20T13:38:06.133Zmore like thismore than 2017-12-20T13:38:06.133Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
3394
label Biography information for Lord Colwyn more like this