Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

451039
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Tribunals: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2016 to Question 24107, on tribunals: Scotland, how many people whose data was breached were making an appeal in respect of personal independence payment; and how many such people had their appeal upheld. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberdeen North more like this
tabling member printed
Kirsty Blackman more like this
uin 26107 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of non-devolved tribunals there were in Scotland between April 2013 to March 2014 and April 2014 and March 2015.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Tribunal Disposals in Scotland 2013-2014 and 2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>2013-2014</p></td><td><p>2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Social Security and Child Support</p></td><td><p>59,984</p></td><td><p>15,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (First-tier)</p></td><td><p>3,580</p></td><td><p>2,637</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>275</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment</p></td><td><p>22,098</p></td><td><p>14,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment Appeals Tribunal</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Administrative Appeals Chamber (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>1,229</p></td><td><p>868</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax <sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>General Regulatory Chamber <sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Injuries Compensation <sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>148</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax (Upper Tribunal) <sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>1) Disposals only held at UK level</p><p>2) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 5 in 2013-2014 and 6 in 2014-2015</p><p>3) Disposals only recorded for Scotland since August 2014.</p><p>4) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 13 in 2013-2014 and 3 in 2014-2015</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service does not hold the information requested in central records of data breaches.</p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
grouped question UIN
26103 more like this
26108 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.777Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.777Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4357
label Biography information for Kirsty Blackman more like this
451040
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Tribunals: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many non-devolved tribunals there were in Scotland HM Courts and Tribunals Service between (a) April 2013 and March 2014 and (b) April 2014 and March 2015. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberdeen North more like this
tabling member printed
Kirsty Blackman more like this
uin 26103 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of non-devolved tribunals there were in Scotland between April 2013 to March 2014 and April 2014 and March 2015.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Tribunal Disposals in Scotland 2013-2014 and 2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>2013-2014</p></td><td><p>2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Social Security and Child Support</p></td><td><p>59,984</p></td><td><p>15,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (First-tier)</p></td><td><p>3,580</p></td><td><p>2,637</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>275</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment</p></td><td><p>22,098</p></td><td><p>14,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment Appeals Tribunal</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Administrative Appeals Chamber (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>1,229</p></td><td><p>868</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax <sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>General Regulatory Chamber <sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Injuries Compensation <sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>148</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax (Upper Tribunal) <sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>1) Disposals only held at UK level</p><p>2) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 5 in 2013-2014 and 6 in 2014-2015</p><p>3) Disposals only recorded for Scotland since August 2014.</p><p>4) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 13 in 2013-2014 and 3 in 2014-2015</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service does not hold the information requested in central records of data breaches.</p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
grouped question UIN
26107 more like this
26108 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.7Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.7Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4357
label Biography information for Kirsty Blackman more like this
451041
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Tribunals: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2016 to Question 24107 on tribunals: Scotland, how many of those people whose data was breached were made aware that that breach had occurred. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberdeen North more like this
tabling member printed
Kirsty Blackman more like this
uin 26104 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>Her Majesty's Courts &amp; Tribunals Service takes its responsibility for data incidents very seriously and treats each case on its individual merits. Notifying individuals of data breaches or incidents is considered, but is not a mandatory action in every instance.</p><p> </p><p>Informing people and organisations about a breach is not an end in itself. Notification should have a clear purpose, whether this is to enable individuals who may have been affected to take steps to protect themselves or to allow the appropriate regulatory bodies to perform their functions, provide advice and deal with complaints.</p><p> </p><p>The above criteria is considered when deciding whether or not to inform individuals or organisations of a data breach. In relation to the incidents referred to in this PQ it is unclear, as no statistical information has been retained, as to whether or not individuals were notified.</p><p> </p><p>Guidance on data breach notification is set out by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) in the link below:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-7-security/" target="_blank">https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-7-security/</a></p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:20:27.867Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:20:27.867Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4357
label Biography information for Kirsty Blackman more like this
451042
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Tribunals: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2016 to Question 24107 on tribunals: Scotland, how many of those people whose data was breached were not made aware that that breach had occurred. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberdeen North more like this
tabling member printed
Kirsty Blackman more like this
uin 26105 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>Her Majesty's Courts &amp; Tribunals Service takes its responsibility for data incidents very seriously and treats each case on its individual merits. Notifying individuals of data breaches or incidents is considered, but is not a mandatory action in every instance.</p><p> </p><p>Informing people and organisations about a breach is not an end in itself. Notification should have a clear purpose, whether this is to enable individuals who may have been affected to take steps to protect themselves or to allow the appropriate regulatory bodies to perform their functions, provide advice and deal with complaints.</p><p> </p><p>The above criteria is considered when deciding whether or not to inform individuals or organisations of a data breach. In relation to the incidents referred to in this PQ it is unclear, as no statistical information has been retained, as to whether or not individuals were notified.</p><p> </p><p>Guidance on data breach notification is set out by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) in the link below:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-7-security/" target="_blank">https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-7-security/</a></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:10:52.257Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:10:52.257Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4357
label Biography information for Kirsty Blackman more like this
451043
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Tribunals: Scotland more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2016 to Question 24107, on tribunals: Scotland, if he will estimate how many of the people whose data was breached in incidents related to non-devolved tribunals were assessed as vulnerable. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberdeen North more like this
tabling member printed
Kirsty Blackman more like this
uin 26108 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of non-devolved tribunals there were in Scotland between April 2013 to March 2014 and April 2014 and March 2015.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Tribunal Disposals in Scotland 2013-2014 and 2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>2013-2014</p></td><td><p>2014-2015</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Social Security and Child Support</p></td><td><p>59,984</p></td><td><p>15,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (First-tier)</p></td><td><p>3,580</p></td><td><p>2,637</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immigration and Asylum (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>275</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment</p></td><td><p>22,098</p></td><td><p>14,767</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Employment Appeals Tribunal</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Administrative Appeals Chamber (Upper Tribunal)</p></td><td><p>1,229</p></td><td><p>868</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax <sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>General Regulatory Chamber <sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Criminal Injuries Compensation <sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>148</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax (Upper Tribunal) <sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>1) Disposals only held at UK level</p><p>2) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 5 in 2013-2014 and 6 in 2014-2015</p><p>3) Disposals only recorded for Scotland since August 2014.</p><p>4) Disposals only held at UK level, but hearings are recorded in Scotland, 13 in 2013-2014 and 3 in 2014-2015</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service does not hold the information requested in central records of data breaches.</p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
grouped question UIN
26103 more like this
26107 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.857Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T16:46:39.857Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4357
label Biography information for Kirsty Blackman more like this
451044
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Family Courts: Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will commission an assessment of the effect on victims of domestic abuse and their families of the use of common entrances at family courts for both the perpetrators and victims of that crime. more like this
tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
uin 26113 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>Every family court has a system to support vulnerable court users. Protective measures are put in place whenever a court is aware that an individual involved in a case may be violent. These can include separate waiting areas, additional security and the use of separate entrances where appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of children or women injured by a perpetrator of domestic violence after a Family Court decision relating to child contact is not held centrally and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost by manually checking case files in criminal and family courts and matching records.</p><p> </p><p>The family court takes the issue of domestic violence extremely seriously. Where domestic violence or abuse is admitted or proven, any child arrangements order put in place must protect the safety and wellbeing of the child and the parent with whom the child is living, and not expose them to the risk of further harm. In particular, the court must be satisfied that any contact ordered with a parent who has perpetrated violence or abuse is safe and in the best interests of the child.</p><p>Where the court does conclude that direct contact is safe and beneficial for the child, it can impose conditions such as supervised contact to protect the child.</p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
grouped question UIN 26114 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:30:52.147Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:30:52.147Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
4122
label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this
451045
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Security more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 10 December 2015 to Question 18874, on offensive weapons: confiscation orders, how many such confiscations took place in each Crown and magistrates' court in each of those years. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 26051 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>The information requested could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:00:45.997Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:00:45.997Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
451046
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Courts: Security more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 10 December 2015 to Question 18874, what assessment he has made of the reasons for the increase in the number of knives confiscated in Crown courts between 2012-13 and 2014-15. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 26052 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>My Department takes the issue of security within courts extremely seriously and has robust security and safety systems in place to protect all court users and judiciary. These systems include mandatory bag searches, modern detection equipment, X-ray machines and surveillance cameras, as well as court security officers with the legal powers to seize items where required. Security procedures, including the detection technology used, are continuously reviewed to ensure that security is as effective as possible.</p><p> </p><p>The increase in the number of knives taken from people as they enter Crown Courts between 2012/13 and 2014/15 may be due to the implementation of more robust training for Court Security Officers; improved rates of recording for the taking of such items and improved searching of people entering Crown Courts.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:47:20.46Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:47:20.46Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
451048
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Crime: Victims more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to publish proposals to introduce a victims' law. more like this
tabling member constituency Holborn and St Pancras more like this
tabling member printed
Keir Starmer more like this
uin 26033 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>In the Queen’s Speech we made a commitment to bring forward measures to increase the rights of victims of crime. Further detail on our plans will be published in due course.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T11:28:46.107Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T11:28:46.107Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
4514
label Biography information for Keir Starmer more like this
451049
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-05more like thismore than 2016-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Justice remove filter
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many children and women were seriously injured by a perpetrator of domestic violence after a Family Court decision to allow child access for a perpetrator of that crime in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Stockton North more like this
tabling member printed
Alex Cunningham more like this
uin 26114 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-10more like thismore than 2016-02-10
answer text <p>Every family court has a system to support vulnerable court users. Protective measures are put in place whenever a court is aware that an individual involved in a case may be violent. These can include separate waiting areas, additional security and the use of separate entrances where appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of children or women injured by a perpetrator of domestic violence after a Family Court decision relating to child contact is not held centrally and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost by manually checking case files in criminal and family courts and matching records.</p><p> </p><p>The family court takes the issue of domestic violence extremely seriously. Where domestic violence or abuse is admitted or proven, any child arrangements order put in place must protect the safety and wellbeing of the child and the parent with whom the child is living, and not expose them to the risk of further harm. In particular, the court must be satisfied that any contact ordered with a parent who has perpetrated violence or abuse is safe and in the best interests of the child.</p><p>Where the court does conclude that direct contact is safe and beneficial for the child, it can impose conditions such as supervised contact to protect the child.</p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
grouped question UIN 26113 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-10T17:30:52.21Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-10T17:30:52.21Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
4122
label Biography information for Alex Cunningham more like this