Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

418455
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-09-11more like thismore than 2015-09-11
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Prostate Cancer more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, when he expects the final results of the National Institute for Health Research's ProtecT trials for prostate cancer testing to be published; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency East Londonderry more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
uin 9996 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-09-16more like thismore than 2015-09-16
answer text <p>The ProtecT randomised controlled trial is evaluating the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of active monitoring, radical 3D conformal radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer, identified through population-based PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) testing.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>There have already been over 100 published outputs from ProtecT and these are listed on the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) website:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/962099</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The researchers plan to publish the primary and most secondary analyses during 2016 at major relevant conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. The primary outcome to be evaluated is definite or probable prostate cancer specific mortality at a median of 10 years following randomisation. A monograph covering these findings is expected to be published in the NIHR Journals Library in July 2017. Findings from longer term follow-up will be published at a later stage.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Mid Norfolk more like this
answering member printed George Freeman more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-09-16T15:17:51.32Zmore like thismore than 2015-09-16T15:17:51.32Z
answering member
4020
label Biography information for George Freeman more like this
tabling member
1409
label Biography information for Mr Gregory Campbell more like this
418513
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-09-11more like thismore than 2015-09-11
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Network Rail more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether officials in his Department have attended any meetings of Network Rail's (a) Major Projects Delivery sub-committee, (b) Critical Infrastructure sub-committee and (c) Business Plan sub-committee since 22 January 2015. more like this
tabling member constituency Nottingham South more like this
tabling member printed
Lilian Greenwood more like this
uin 10082 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-09-16more like thismore than 2015-09-16
answer text <p>No Department for Transport officials have attended any meetings of Network Rail's Major Projects Delivery sub-committee, Critical Infrastructure sub-committee or Business Plan sub-committee since 22 January 2015. However, officials from the Shareholder Executive attended eleven meetings of the Major Projects Delivery Committee in that time to observe, in order improve mutual understanding between Network Rail and the Government.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Devizes more like this
answering member printed Claire Perry more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-09-16T15:08:34.067Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
3974
label Biography information for Claire Perry more like this
tabling member
4029
label Biography information for Lilian Greenwood more like this
418516
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-09-11more like thismore than 2015-09-11
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Rolling Stock: Standards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 September 2015 to Question 9152, and with reference to page 214 of his Department's Great Western Franchise Agreement of 22 March 2015, what advice he received from the Rail Safety and Standards Board and the Office of Rail and Road prior to his decision to include in that Agreement a requirement for the Great Western franchisee to develop proposals for main line trial deployment of converted Class 230 trains taking into account the applicability and safety implications of the deviations granted to D78 London Underground rolling stock in 2002 for (a) non-fitment of train protection and warning system in-cab equipment and (b) non-compliance with railway group standards structural requirements for windscreens and windows. more like this
tabling member constituency Nottingham South more like this
tabling member printed
Lilian Greenwood more like this
uin 10085 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-09-16more like thismore than 2015-09-16
answer text <p>The Secretary of State has not decided to require the Great Western franchisee to develop proposals for main line train deployment of converted Class 230 trains.  The obligation in the new First Great Western franchise agreement is for the Franchisee to submit an initial feasibility study.  The franchise agreement makes clear that any proposals for a trial that might derive from that report would be subject to a separate decision by the Secretary of State and would be subject to initial examination confirming likely viability.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Devizes more like this
answering member printed Claire Perry more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-09-16T15:20:57.637Z
answering member
3974
label Biography information for Claire Perry more like this
tabling member
4029
label Biography information for Lilian Greenwood more like this